Bug#336201: acknowledged by developer (Bug#336201: fixed in hugs98 98.200503.08-4)

2005-11-03 Thread Ross Paterson
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:37:25PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > The only non-standard thing I have in my environment that is related to > gzip is this variable: > > GZIP=--best OK, that's the problem. hugs98/debian/rules uses a variable GZIP, and when you make it an environment variable, the

Bug#336201: acknowledged by developer (Bug#336201: fixed in hugs98 98.200503.08-4)

2005-11-03 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
> Do you have a private version of gzip? It seems to be adding gzip to > the command line of /bin/gzip. No. $ where gzip /bin/gzip The only non-standard thing I have in my environment that is related to gzip is this variable: GZIP=--best > (Does gzip -9v foo produce this message?) $ gzip

Bug#336201: acknowledged by developer (Bug#336201: fixed in hugs98 98.200503.08-4)

2005-11-03 Thread Ross Paterson
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:13:23PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > > hugs98 (98.200503.08-4) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >* Added buid-depends on gzip (Closes: #336201). > > Thank you for this new version ! Unfortunately it does not fix my > problem. In fact gzip was already installed on

Bug#336201: acknowledged by developer (Bug#336201: fixed in hugs98 98.200503.08-4)

2005-11-03 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
> hugs98 (98.200503.08-4) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Added buid-depends on gzip (Closes: #336201). Thank you for this new version ! Unfortunately it does not fix my problem. In fact gzip was already installed on my system. $ fakeroot apt-get -b source hugs Reading Package Lists... Done