Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-11-03 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 02:01:18PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > tags 336167 +patch > > > thanks > > > > > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff be

Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-11-03 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > tags 336167 +patch > > thanks > > > > Sven Luther wrote: > > [snip] > > > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2 > > > > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know t

Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-11-03 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > tags 336167 +patch > thanks > > Sven Luther wrote: > [snip] > > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2 > > > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know that part of > > > gcc enough to jud

Processed: Re: Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-11-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 336167 +patch Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-11-03 Thread Thiemo Seufer
tags 336167 +patch thanks Sven Luther wrote: [snip] > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2 > > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know that part of > > gcc enough to judge if it is a valid fix for the problem. > > > > Sven, could you test if this

Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-11-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:33:35PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > Package: gcc-4.0 > > > Version: 4.0.2-3 > > > Severity: grave > > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > > > > > > Well, i confirm that this problem is also present on pow

Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-11-01 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > Package: gcc-4.0 > > Version: 4.0.2-3 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > > > Well, i confirm that this problem is also present on powerpc, using > > gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 makes the kernel build fail, while using -2 seems

Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-10-29 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Thiemo Seufer a écrit : Thiemo Seufer wrote: Sven Luther wrote: Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It affects also userland, ncpfs FTBFS for mips/mipsel. and also sane-backends on mipsel. Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno

Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-10-29 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > Package: gcc-4.0 > > Version: 4.0.2-3 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > > > Well, i confirm that this problem is also present on powerpc, using > > gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 makes the kernel build fail, while using -2 seems

Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-10-28 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Sven Luther wrote: > Package: gcc-4.0 > Version: 4.0.2-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > Well, i confirm that this problem is also present on powerpc, using > gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 makes the kernel build fail, while using -2 seems to be > ok. I have heard people mentio

Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.

2005-10-28 Thread Sven Luther
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Well, i confirm that this problem is also present on powerpc, using gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 makes the kernel build fail, while using -2 seems to be ok. I have heard people mentioning two other arches where this is t