Arnaud Patard (Rtp) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just got this bug too. The problem is caused by this line :
> etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini
No, at least not in the original bug report: On Piem's system, there
was an old conffile for jadetex which
Hi,
I've just got this bug too. The problem is caused by this line :
etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini
[ iirc, this line comes from the parsing of the
/etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf. ]
This line is interpreted by the shell as the following two lines :
$ etex -i
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:37:36PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:59:57AM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> > Here it is tried to build the jadetex format with the TeX engine.
> > Problem is, that it uses the LaTeX format, which was build with the
> > pdfetex engine. What fil
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:59:57AM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> Here it is tried to build the jadetex format with the TeX engine.
> Problem is, that it uses the LaTeX format, which was build with the
> pdfetex engine. What files do you have in '/etc/texmf/fmt.d/'? What's
> the content of '/etc/texm
Hi Paul,
thanks for reporting this problem. For whatever reason it didn't reach
our mailing list. I only saw it right now in the web interface. We had
that recently with another bugreport. Maybe these messages are simply to
large for the mailing list software?
Anyway, concerning your bug report.
5 matches
Mail list logo
