Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 329345 + etch Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start There were no tags set. Tags added: etch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start

2005-09-21 Thread Sylvain FORET
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: tags 329345 + testing pending close 329345 1.5.90-1 thanks On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 19:07:02 +1000, Sylvain FORET wrote: In debian testing, after a libgoffice-1 upgrade, gnumeric does not start. As goffice's API has not stabilised yet, gnumeric and goffice need to

Processed: Re: Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
xed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > close 329345 1.5.90-1 Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5.90-1,

Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start

2005-09-21 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
tags 329345 + testing pending close 329345 1.5.90-1 thanks On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 19:07:02 +1000, Sylvain FORET wrote: > In debian testing, after a libgoffice-1 upgrade, gnumeric does not > start. As goffice's API has not stabilised yet, gnumeric and goffice need to be upgraded in lock-step. The

Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start

2005-09-21 Thread Sylvain FORET
Package: gnumeric Version: 1.5.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable In debian testing, after a libgoffice-1 upgrade, gnumeric does not start. It crashes with the following error message: gnumeric: symbol lookup error: gnumeric: undefined symbol: cell_formats and return 1