Hello,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:01:55 - "W. Borgert" wrote:
>Using just dblatex in doc/Makefile is easy, but there is a minor
>problem: The PS output does not build (not needed nor used, but
>still...). Patch to cdbs attached. Btw: In the XML file,
The situation for dblatex is as follows:
Th
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:07PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Well, thanks for the work you did and for sharing it! I think, we
> > should drop db2latex-xsl from Debian in the long run and promote
> > dblatex (http://packages.debian.org/dblatex) as alternative. The
> > new version of dblatex i
* W. Borgert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061017 18:08]:
> Quoting Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I lack the skills, time, and interest to do so, but I'm sending this
> > here to save other people from the investigation.
>
> Well, thanks for the work you did and for sharing it! I think, we
> shoul
Quoting Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I lack the skills, time, and interest to do so, but I'm sending this
> here to save other people from the investigation.
Well, thanks for the work you did and for sharing it! I think, we
should drop db2latex-xsl from Debian in the long run and promote
d
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005, W. Borgert wrote:
> Certain files in the source archive are not really sources. In
> almost all files under
> /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/db2latex/latex/common/, it is
> stated, that "Developers should not commit sundry patches
> against this file. The sou
Package: db2latex-xsl
Version: 0.8pre1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Certain files in the source archive are not really sources. In
almost all files under
/usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/db2latex/latex/common/, it is
stated, that "Developers should not commit sundry patches
against t
6 matches
Mail list logo
