On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:35:40AM -, Carl Johnstone wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I've not had a proper chance to test yet - I've been moved to another
> project at work so this box is currently a secondary priority.
>
> On initial tests 2.6.13 seems to be better, certainly I've managed to get
Hi,
Sorry I've not had a proper chance to test yet - I've been moved to another
project at work so this box is currently a secondary priority.
On initial tests 2.6.13 seems to be better, certainly I've managed to get
the array to setup and seemingly sync. It died again whilst copying across
Hello,
can you give linux-image-2.6.13-1-amd64-k8 from experimental a try?
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I've tried the stable -k8 kernel. I've now also tried
linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 from unstable.
In both cases it's causing the machine to reboot whilst trying to sync a
RAID5 array across 6 disks on two SATA controllers.
For information, I can build the array across the first 5 disks, an
Hello,
2.6.8 has known issues with software-raid. You can try a newer kernel,
preferably linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 from unstable - unless you are
using udev, then you need to uninstall udev first (or use a backport).
is this problem reproducible with a 2.6.12 debian kernel?
By the way: you s
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-generic
Version: 2.6.8-14
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Keep getting lockups, in particular whilst trying to sync a RAID5 array across
several SATA drives.
Setting a RAID1 partition across the same drives seems to work OK though.
6 matches
Mail list logo
