Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>>If glibc in unstable doesn't require significant fixes to build with gcc-4.0,
>>it really would be a good idea to backport the fix for this bug and the
>>rpc/xdr.h one.
>
>
> I started to try this but gave
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> If glibc in unstable doesn't require significant fixes to build with gcc-4.0,
> it really would be a good idea to backport the fix for this bug and the
> rpc/xdr.h one.
I started to try this but gave up quite quickly; the problem
So, 496 more packages in the C++ transition waiting on glibc.
If glibc in unstable doesn't require significant fixes to build with gcc-4.0,
it really would be a good idea to backport the fix for this bug and the
rpc/xdr.h one.
If it does require significant fixes, perhaps you could suggest to the
3 matches
Mail list logo
