Hi,
mlang, le Thu 01 Dec 2005 13:52:36 +0100, a écrit :
> I am well aware of this, my point was merely that it is questionable
> (to me) how necessary it is to get something into testing, which is
> already obsolete.
Isn't speakup used?
Regards,
Samuel
Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Mario Lang, le Wed 30 Nov 2005 09:28:35 +0100, a écrit :
>> Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I intent to NMU this package soon to integrate these patches in order to
>> > have the image in testing one day. Please tell me if y
Hi,
Mario Lang, le Wed 30 Nov 2005 09:28:35 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I intent to NMU this package soon to integrate these patches in order to
> > have the image in testing one day. Please tell me if you wish me not to
> > do so.
>
> No problem with me,
Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I intent to NMU this package soon to integrate these patches in order to
> have the image in testing one day. Please tell me if you wish me not to
> do so.
No problem with me, if you really think working on speakup 2.4
is worth it...
--
CYa,
4 matches
Mail list logo
