reassign 313219 glibc
tag 313219 +fixed-in-experimental
thanks,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:11:39PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:24:11AM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote:
> > > I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e.
> > >
> > > gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 313219 glibc
Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4
Bug reassigned from package `gnome-vfs2' to `glibc'.
> tag 313219 +fixed-in-experimental
Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_f
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:24:11AM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote:
> > I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e.
> >
> > gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a.c
> Look further, I think /usr/include/features.h gives some hints:
>
> # ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
> extern int
> I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e.
>
> gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a.c
Look further, I think /usr/include/features.h gives some hints:
# ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
extern int posix_fadvise (int __fd, __off_t __offset, __off_t __len,
> Right, very interesting.. Thanks for you debugging efforts! Lemme see if i can
> trace this back to the real cause :)
I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e.
gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a.c
and it crashes.
Cheers,
--
Ivan, Wong Yat Cheung <[EMAIL PR
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:48:38AM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote:
> Hi,
> > Odd, when creating a simple sample program that calls posix_fadvise it works
> > fine on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
> Attached please find the source of my testing program. In fact, it
> actually does:
>
> int main()
> {
>
Hi,
> Odd, when creating a simple sample program that calls posix_fadvise it works
> fine on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
Attached please find the source of my testing program. In fact, it
actually does:
int main()
{
int fd;
fd = open("a.c", 0);
posix_fadvise (fd, 0, 0, POSIX
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:05:52PM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote:
> I have got a more or less the same BT, just that it's nautuils that crashes on
> gnome boot.
> libgnomevfs2-dbg doesn't help much in providing the debugging symbols of
> libfile.so (where the crash starts). I apt-get source, compiled with
Package: libgnomevfs2-common
Version: 2.10.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #313219
I have got a more or less the same BT, just that it's nautuils that crashes on
gnome boot.
libgnomevfs2-dbg doesn't help much in providing the debugging symbols of
libfile.so (where the crash starts). I apt-get source, compi
9 matches
Mail list logo
