On 20.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Florent,
> > Next log. Hope it is useful. I've put your debug log into rules and
> > rules.in. The commonstuff_update I've removed only from rules.in. I
> > firstly executed the clean target and a
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Next log. Hope it is useful. I've put your debug log into rules and
> rules.in. The commonstuff_update I've removed only from rules.in. I
> firstly executed the clean target and after it ended the binary
> target.
Perfect, thanks. So, it doesn't loop an
On 19.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Could you try to remove "commonstuff_update" from the double-colon
> rule and tell us if it loops again (and if so, attach the log file
> with the debug snippets)? Normally, removing it from rules.in only
> should be sufficient since aft
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure. Here we go.
Thanks.
As you can see, when the second debug snippet is written, Make has
already taken the wrong decision of rebuilding debian/rules (the fact
that the snippet is printed means that Make is running the commands to
update debian/rule
On 18.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
> Could you please insert the following lines:
>
> @printf "\n\n"
> @ls -l --time-style=full-iso $(eperl_sourcefiles) \
> debian/rules.in debian/rules
> @printf "\n\n"
>
> after:
>
> # Eperl is simply gre
5 matches
Mail list logo
