Processed: Re: Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

2005-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Severity #307366 grave Bug#307366: libpam-pgsql: new package misses features/fixes from NMUs Severity set to `grave'. > Merge #307784 #307366 Bug#307366: libpam-pgsql: new package misses features/fixes from NMUs Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CA

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

2005-05-07 Thread Primoz
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 13:48 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: > Severity #307366 Grave > Merge #307784 #307366 > Thanks dear bugtracking system. > > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:10:17PM +0200, Primoz wrote: > > Is there a way to revert the upload to the NMUed one (which had security > > problems fixed), so p

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

2005-05-07 Thread Micha Lenk
Severity #307366 Grave Merge #307784 #307366 Thanks dear bugtracking system. On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:10:17PM +0200, Primoz wrote: > Is there a way to revert the upload to the NMUed one (which had security > problems fixed), so package stays in sarge. I would need at least a week > to 14 days to

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

2005-05-06 Thread Primoz
Is there a way to revert the upload to the NMUed one (which had security problems fixed), so package stays in sarge. I would need at least a week to 14 days to port pam-mysql to pgsql (which seems like the best way to go). Primoz On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 16:03 +0200, Joerg Wendland wrote: > On Fri,

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

2005-05-06 Thread Joerg Wendland
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Primoz wrote: > I would be willing to fix and maintain the package if there is someone who > would be willing to sponsor the upload. Please go ahead, I'll sponsor your uploads. Joerg -- Joerg "joergland" Wendland | http://www.wendlandnet.de/joerg/ GP

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

2005-05-06 Thread Joerg Wendland
Hi Steve, On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:57:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:41:13PM +0200, Primoz Bratanic wrote: > > Package: pam-pgsql > > Severity: critical > > Tags: security > > Justification: root security hole > > > The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked a

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

2005-05-06 Thread Primoz
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:41:13PM +0200, Primoz Bratanic wrote: > > Package: pam-pgsql > > Severity: critical > > Tags: security > > Justification: root security hole > > > The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open > > again. The changes have disappeared. Plea

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

2005-05-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:41:13PM +0200, Primoz Bratanic wrote: > Package: pam-pgsql > Severity: critical > Tags: security > Justification: root security hole > The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open > again. The changes have disappeared. Please see the patch

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

2005-05-05 Thread Primoz Bratanic
Package: pam-pgsql Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open again. The changes have disappeared. Please see the patch attached to Bug#230875 regar