On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:15:39AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and
> > > libpam-ldap need to be linked agains
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and
> > libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or
> > 'ldap_r'). I thought I had don
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and
> libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or
> 'ldap_r'). I thought I had done this for both, but apparently not.
> Linking agains
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and
> libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or
> 'ldap_r'). I thought I had done this for both, but apparently not.
> Linking agains
reassign 306258 libpam-ldap
retitle 306258 libpam-ldap needs to be linked against ldap_r
thanks
Greetings,
Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and
libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or
'ldap_r'). I thought I had done this for both
5 matches
Mail list logo
