Bug#302684: Please discuss with ifupdown maintainer

2005-04-06 Thread Anand Kumria
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:56:11AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 17:50 +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > What kind of 'double address assignments' are you seeing? > > # ip addr show ethp_0 > 8: ethp_0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:80:c7:ee:88:d6 brd ff:

Bug#302684: Please discuss with ifupdown maintainer

2005-04-06 Thread Thomas Hood
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 17:50 +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > What kind of 'double address assignments' are you seeing? # ip addr show ethp_0 8: ethp_0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:80:c7:ee:88:d6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.8/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope link ethp_

Bug#302684: Please discuss with ifupdown maintainer

2005-04-06 Thread Anand Kumria
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:42:49PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > retitle 302684 ifupdown hook script results in double address assignments; it > should be removed > thanks > > For now the hook script in if-up.d should be removed IMHO. The package > remains useful to people who are prepared to run

Bug#302684: Please discuss with ifupdown maintainer

2005-04-05 Thread Thomas Hood
retitle 302684 ifupdown hook script results in double address assignments; it should be removed thanks For now the hook script in if-up.d should be removed IMHO. The package remains useful to people who are prepared to run zeroconf manually. Further integration with ifupdown should be discussed