On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
> If 2.0.4 will include other significant changes besides the removal of the
> fonts, this is really not the time in the release cycle to be packaging new
> upstream releases to fix RC bugs that can easily be fixed in other ways.
And what is the ti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 298965 serious
Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 298965 important
Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tags 298965 sarge sid fixed-upstream
severity298965 important
thanks
On 10 Mar 2005 at 21:06, Peter De Wachter wrote:
> No copyright or license for this font is included. Unless this font has
> been released in the public domain, Debian cannot distribute it, and
> therefore it should be remove
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 298965 sarge sid fixed-upstream
Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge, sid, fixed-upstream
> severity298965 important
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Package: afterstep
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains the font:
afterstep-2.00.03/libAfterImage/apps/test.ttf
No copyright or license for this font is included. Unless this font has
been released in the public domain, Debian cannot distribute it, and
therefore
6 matches
Mail list logo
