severity #298929 important
thanks
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:10:49AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Martin Pool wrote:
> > I don't think there is any new information in this report beyond what
> > has been on the web site for many months. distcc is secure when used as
> > directed.
>
> If this r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #298929 important
Bug#298929: Security problem in distcc
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Martin Pool wrote:
> Hi Frank, Martin,
>
> I don't think there is any new information in this report beyond what
> has been on the web site for many months. distcc is secure when used as
> directed.
If this report is irrelevant for Debian, feel free to close it right
away.
Regards,
Joe
Hi Frank, Martin,
I don't think there is any new information in this report beyond what
has been on the web site for many months. distcc is secure when used as
directed.
I agree Apple should upgrade, but that is irrelevant to debian and
beyond my control.
For reasons that ought to be obvious, mere
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:30:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Exploit:
>
> There are a few known exploits for distcc. By using a common method
> provided by metasploit (http://metasploit.com/projects/Framework/
> exploits.html#distcc_exec), I was given full access to the remote users
> home fo
Package: distcc
Version: 2.18.1-5
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge sid security
Saw this on bugtraq:
XCode ships with version 2.0.1 of distcc. We also tried updating to
2.18.3 and had similar issues with that version as well.
Apple was not contacted prior to this release because the exploit for
distcc
6 matches
Mail list logo
