Bug#293210: bluez-bcm203x bug

2005-02-05 Thread Edd Dumbill
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 19:20 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Hmm, it is possible to only move one binary package to contrib and there > are examples for this in the archive. I don't know if this is > encouraged, though. Well, I'll give it a try then. I've prepared a new package whose Section is

Bug#293210: bluez-bcm203x bug

2005-02-05 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 05:13:51PM +, Edd Dumbill wrote: > On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 17:38 +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > IMO the situation for this package is different from the kernel's. > > > > In the case of the kernel, it functions completely ok without any of > > the non-free firmwares; th

Bug#293210: bluez-bcm203x bug

2005-02-05 Thread Edd Dumbill
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 17:38 +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi! > > IMO the situation for this package is different from the kernel's. > > In the case of the kernel, it functions completely ok without any of > the non-free firmwares; those only provide additional functionality. > > Bluez-bcm203x'

Bug#293210: bluez-bcm203x bug

2005-02-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi! IMO the situation for this package is different from the kernel's. In the case of the kernel, it functions completely ok without any of the non-free firmwares; those only provide additional functionality. Bluez-bcm203x's only function otoh, is to load the non-free firmware. In this aspect,