> It is no viable strategy to release with a libglade2 that has
> incompatible behaviour to upstream. Just think of a user compiling
> software locally that relies on the changes made in libglade
> 2.4.1.
Then you will need to change the name of the libglade binary package
instead. It is not acce
Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hola Ross Burton!
>
>> What about glade files and applications which expect the new API to be
>> used? The problem is that the two APIs cannot be mixed, so will this
>> change just result in a different set of applications breaking?
>
> If there
2 matches
Mail list logo
