Because of this bug, rust-protobuf is now marked for autoremoval
together with the following packages:
rust-erbium, rust-erbium-core, rust-pprof, rust-prometheus,
rust-protobuf-codegen, rust-protobuf-codegen-pure, rust-protoc-rust,
rust-ttrpc, scaphandre.
scaphandre was already decoupled fro
I decoupled handlebars from the rest and filed [1] to also decouple
prometheus: erbium (its only (transitive) reverse dependency
application) doesn't use protobuf's functionality. This however is not a
small change, so it needs consensus from the team (hence the MR). Pros
and cons are detailed
On 25/04/25 07:05, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Scaphande is now (pending upload) patched to no longer build-depend on
the protobuf crate. Turns out it was optional and already unused for
other reasons (will file a bug about that upstream).
Thanks Jonas!
As for erbium (via erbium-core), it looks l
Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-04-25 03:02:57)
> - scaphandre (leaf, no rdeps)
Scaphande is now (pending upload) patched to no longer build-depend on
the protobuf crate. Turns out it was optional and already unused for
other reasons (will file a bug about that upstream).
Thanks!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas
Source: rust-protobuf
Followup-For: Bug #1103833
X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com, jel...@debian.org, infini...@debian.org,
d...@jones.dk
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/stepancheg/rust-protobuf/issues/763
I looked into this, I will try to summarize the situation to the best of my
kn
5 matches
Mail list logo
