Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch upstream
Bug #1101238 [src:lua-lgi] lua-lgi: FTBFS: tests/pango.lua:43: failure
Added tag(s) patch and upstream.
--
1101238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101238
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: tags -1 + patch upstream
Hi Reiner,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:39:23PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango/-/merge_requests/829
> looks like the "smoking gun". Especially the change in fwupd looks
> relevant: https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/8587
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:33:30PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi Reiner,
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:04:00PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:11:09AM +, Santiago
Hi Reiner,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:04:00PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:11:09AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > Package: src:lua-lgi
> >
> thanks for bisecting.
> But it seems
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:04:00PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:11:09AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Package: src:lua-lgi
>
> FTR, debbisect says:
>
> bisection finished successfully
> last good timestamp: 20240103T032204Z
> first bad timestamp:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:11:09AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:lua-lgi
FTR, debbisect says:
bisection finished successfully
last good timestamp: 20240103T032204Z
first bad timestamp: 20240103T211436Z
the following packages differ between the last good and first bad timestamp:
Package: src:lua-lgi
Version: 0.9.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --builds
7 matches
Mail list logo
