Bug#1099900: src:gocryptfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-05-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Mon, 12 May 2025 14:12:31 +0200 Santiago Vila wrote: Tracker says "Marked for autoremoval on 20 May: #1099900" This is a ping to delay the autoremoval. Let's do that once more now that the package is only blocked by age. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sign

Bug#1099900: src:gocryptfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-05-12 Thread Santiago Vila
Tracker says "Marked for autoremoval on 20 May: #1099900" This is a ping to delay the autoremoval.

Bug#1099900: src:gocryptfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-05-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 02:28:23PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: >... > Migration status for gocryptfs (2.4.0-1 to 2.5.1-1): BLOCKED: > Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression > Issues preventing migration: > ∙ ∙ Updating gocryptfs would introduce bugs in testing: #1097131 > ∙ ∙ miss

Bug#1099900: src:gocryptfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-03-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: gocryptfs Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.5.1-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as h