Bug#1099467: Emacs 30.1 byte-compilation failures

2025-03-08 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat 08 Mar 2025 at 08:20pm +01, Micha Lenk wrote: > Both tiny changes target a situation that in practice[1] would not surface > without using bookworm-backports. Hence I'd consider both changes even > acceptable if uploaded to bookworm-backports directly (e.g. as a ~bpo12+2 > upload to

Bug#1099467: Emacs 30.1 byte-compilation failures

2025-03-08 Thread Micha Lenk
Hi Sean, Am 8. März 2025 13:21:14 MEZ schrieb Sean Whitton : >I'm waiting for dh-elpa and Emacs to migrate, unless you would allow an >exception, so that I can upload immediately? > >Diffs between testing and sid are tiny: [...] Both tiny changes target a situation that in practice[1] would not s

Bug#1099467: Emacs 30.1 byte-compilation failures

2025-03-08 Thread Sean Whitton
On Sat 08 Mar 2025 at 11:47am +01, Micha Lenk wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Am 6. März 2025 12:49:12 MEZ schrieb Sean Whitton : >>I think I have the fix for these problems. >>Updating the backport of Emacs to 1:30.1+1-4, and uploading an >>NEW, unmodified backport of dh-elpa 2.1.8, should be jointly suffi

Bug#1099467: Emacs 30.1 byte-compilation failures

2025-03-08 Thread Micha Lenk
Hi Sean, Am 6. März 2025 12:49:12 MEZ schrieb Sean Whitton : >I think I have the fix for these problems. >Updating the backport of Emacs to 1:30.1+1-4, and uploading an >NEW, unmodified backport of dh-elpa 2.1.8, should be jointly sufficient. And who is taking action now? Or has this already been

Bug#1099467: Emacs 30.1 byte-compilation failures

2025-03-06 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, I think I have the fix for these problems. Updating the backport of Emacs to 1:30.1+1-4, and uploading an NEW, unmodified backport of dh-elpa 2.1.8, should be jointly sufficient. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature