Bug#1094650: redmine: replace thin with puma as thin is broken with ruby-rack 3

2025-01-30 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 1/29/25 6:33 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: On 1/29/25 6:25 PM, Jakob Haufe wrote: Thin has seen some commits regarding rack 3 compatibility today. That is good. Is there particular reason to remove thin instead of fixing it? It is basically lack of upstream support for rack 3. We could f

Bug#1094650: redmine: replace thin with puma as thin is broken with ruby-rack 3

2025-01-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: found -1 5.1.3+ds-5 On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 17:25:45 +0100 Pirate Praveen wrote: Package: redmine Version: 5.1.3+ds-6 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, We want to ship ruby-rack 3 in trixie (it is already in unstable), but thin does not work with ruby-ra

Bug#1094650: redmine: replace thin with puma as thin is broken with ruby-rack 3

2025-01-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 1/29/25 6:25 PM, Jakob Haufe wrote: Thin has seen some commits regarding rack 3 compatibility today. That is good. Is there particular reason to remove thin instead of fixing it? It is basically lack of upstream support for rack 3. We could fix thin if there is a patch already for r

Bug#1094650: redmine: replace thin with puma as thin is broken with ruby-rack 3

2025-01-29 Thread Jakob Haufe
Thin has seen some commits regarding rack 3 compatibility today. Is there particular reason to remove thin instead of fixing it? Cheers, sur5r -- ceterum censeo microsoftem esse delendam. pgpCGOpFdUrF1.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1094650: redmine: replace thin with puma as thin is broken with ruby-rack 3

2025-01-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: redmine Version: 5.1.3+ds-6 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, We want to ship ruby-rack 3 in trixie (it is already in unstable), but thin does not work with ruby-rack 3. We are hoping to remove thin, so it'd be good if redmine is switched to puma. Else s