Hi Thorsten,
see https://salsa.debian.org/sven-geuer/rng-tools-debian for what,
according to my tests, fixes the issue.
Cheers,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>This is an anti-pattern, and best avoided. What's the problem if the
>script runs twice? If it just detects things it should be just fine,
Extra effort, though. And, in general, TOCTOU, but probably not
applicable here.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
den AGP ste
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 23:12, Sven Geuer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 20:28 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, Sven Geuer wrote:
> >
> > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504044#162
> >
> > > Applying ExecCondition to me seems the most reasonable solutio
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, Sven Geuer wrote:
>> If not, I’d lean towards one (which?) of the errorlevel-using ones,
>> because otherwise we’d have to run the detection code twice.
>
>Not sure what you mean by 'one of the errorlevel-using ones'. Please
>explain your idea in more details.
SuccessExitStat
On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 20:28 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, Sven Geuer wrote:
>
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504044#162
>
> > Applying ExecCondition to me seems the most reasonable solution to this
> > bug.
>
> Can the script behind ExecCondition p
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, Sven Geuer wrote:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504044#162
>Applying ExecCondition to me seems the most reasonable solution to this
>bug.
Can the script behind ExecCondition pass variables to the script
behind ExecStart or, even better, the unit itself
On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 00:47 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2025, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > It looks like this is doing some checks, and intends to skip. But just
> > exiting means the service is recorded as failed, and this will likely
> > trip other tests, hence the severity to s
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>It looks like this is doing some checks, and intends to skip. But just
>exiting means the service is recorded as failed, and this will likely
>trip other tests, hence the severity to stop migrating to testing for
>now.
Ah, ouch. Agreed.
>There are sever
Package: rng-tools-debian
Version: 2.5
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainers,
Thanks for adding a native systemd service!
I noticed that in an autopkgtest-build-qemu VM the service fails:
root@host:~# systemctl status --no-pager -l rng-tools-debian
× rng-tools-debian.service - Hardware RNG entropy g
9 matches
Mail list logo
