Bug#1092330: libmimalloc2.0: fails to provide libmimalloc.so.2.0

On 2025-01-22 10:19:08 +0100, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > A quick (and dirty) workaround is as follow: > > #> sudo ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmimalloc.so.2 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmimalloc.so.3.0 The libraries are not compatible. You should not do that. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web:

Bug#1092330: libmimalloc2.0: fails to provide libmimalloc.so.2.0

Hello, I have experimented the bug as well, this wreck up all the tetex distribution after the attempt to update the system. A quick (and dirty) workaround is as follow: #> sudo ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmimalloc.so.2 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmimalloc.so.3.0 Regards -- Emman

Bug#1092330: libmimalloc2.0: fails to provide libmimalloc.so.2.0

On 2025-01-16 10:38:42 +0100, mister...@web.de wrote: > I'm not familiar with the inner workings of apt-listbugs, but after > adding a found version to this bug I was correctly warned by it when > libmimalloc2.0 was due to be upgraded on another system of mine. > > I can only assume, that libmimal

Bug#1092330: libmimalloc2.0: fails to provide libmimalloc.so.2.0

Am 16.01.25 um 00:20 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > On 2025-01-11 16:21:43 +0100, mister...@web.de wrote: >> Control: found -1 3.0.1+ds-1 >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm just adding a package version to this bug, so that people using >> apt-listbugs may be warned about this. > > No, this has no effect for the tex-

Bug#1092330: libmimalloc2.0: fails to provide libmimalloc.so.2.0

On 2025-01-11 16:21:43 +0100, mister...@web.de wrote: > Control: found -1 3.0.1+ds-1 > > Hi, > > I'm just adding a package version to this bug, so that people using > apt-listbugs may be warned about this. No, this has no effect for the tex-common upgrade: I've just got hit by this bug and got n

Bug#1092330: libmimalloc2.0: fails to provide libmimalloc.so.2.0

Control: found -1 3.0.1+ds-1 Hi, I'm just adding a package version to this bug, so that people using apt-listbugs may be warned about this. Thanks Marcel