Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 14:38:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068063: fixed in sssd 2.9.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068063,
regarding sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx,
test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)
to be marked as done.
This means
On 05/04/24 at 10:04 -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> > 1. --- 0x2 != 0x1
> >src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c:2505: error: Failure!
> >
> >assert_int_equal(test_ctx->result->count, 1);
> >
> > apparently there are 2 results returned while expected just one.
>
> This is because
> 1. --- 0x2 != 0x1
>src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c:2505: error: Failure!
>
>assert_int_equal(test_ctx->result->count, 1);
>
> apparently there are 2 results returned while expected just one.
This is because of time_t now being 64bits and a "%lu" format string
is being used
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:59:51 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI wrote:
Source: sssd
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 2.9.4-1.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
sssd fails to build on armel, armhf.
Though test suite failure was already reported, but
target version is 1.11.5.1
Source: sssd
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 2.9.4-1.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
sssd fails to build on armel, armhf.
Though test suite failure was already reported, but
target version is 1.11.5.1-1, not 2.x branch. so I've filed as a new
bug to raise atten
5 matches
Mail list logo
