Hi,
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 07:54:13AM -0400, P. J. McDermott wrote:
> On 2024-04-19 at 15:55, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > FWIW, I'm actually preparing a security update for the two CVEs and
> > for bookworm I was first planning to do a 590-2.1 reaching unstable,
> > and so then 5
On 2024-04-20 at 16:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 07:54 -0400, P. J. McDermott wrote:
> > Then the salvage procedure can play out for the full 28+ days
> > specified
> > by developers-reference (21 days to allow the maintainer to object
> > followed by a DELAYED/7 adop
On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 07:54 -0400, P. J. McDermott wrote:
> Then the salvage procedure can play out for the full 28+ days
> specified
> by developers-reference (21 days to allow the maintainer to object
> followed by a DELAYED/7 adoption upload). I've already soft-proposed
> to
> salvage in bug #1
On 2024-04-19 at 15:55, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FWIW, I'm actually preparing a security update for the two CVEs and
> for bookworm I was first planning to do a 590-2.1 reaching unstable,
> and so then 590-2.1~deb12u1 for bookworm.
>
> But if you want to override it with a NMU and pr
Hi,
FWIW, I'm actually preparing a security update for the two CVEs and
for bookworm I was first planning to do a 590-2.1 reaching unstable,
and so then 590-2.1~deb12u1 for bookworm.
But if you want to override it with a NMU and proposing to salvage the
package this is equally fine.
Regards,
Sal
On 2024-04-12 at 16:10, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hey.
>
> There seems to be a somewhat similar issue reported by Jakub Wilk on
> oss-security:
> https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/12/5
>
> where quoting causes troubles (though I couldn't replay the demo).
That was since
6 matches
Mail list logo
