Hi
On 2024-01-31 23:53:14 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> This was a package that failed to analyze due to header compilation
> failures.
>
> https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-01-17/logs/libdvbpsi-dev/base/log.txt
>
> Of course if we can know with certainty that the ABI
Hi again,
This was a package that failed to analyze due to header compilation
failures.
https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-01-17/logs/libdvbpsi-dev/base/log.txt
Of course if we can know with certainty that the ABI is not affected, we can
exclude it. But time_t is not the only type af
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Steve
On 2024-02-01 00:06:44 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Source: libdvbpsi
> Version: 1.3.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch pending
> Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: time-t
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> As
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1062277 [src:libdvbpsi] libdvbpsi: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1062277: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062277
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: libdvbpsi
Version: 1.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
(https://wiki
5 matches
Mail list logo