Bug#1056874: python-srsly: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2024-11-22 Thread s3v
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:49:44 +0100 s3v wrote: > 2) building 'srsly.ujson.ujson' extension is fine but is not loaded for some > reasons with >    Python 3.13 (Python 3.12 is ok). > >    E   from .ujson import decode, encode, dump, dumps, load, >loads  # noqa: F401 >    E 

Bug#1056874: python-srsly: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2024-11-22 Thread s3v
Hi, On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 13:37:42 + Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:18:07PM +0100, s3v wrote: > > Seems like python-catalogue 2.0.10 is newer than 2.1.0 :( [1] > > After packaging python-catalogue 2.0.10 as 2.1.1+really2.0.10 (I didn't > > know how > > to circumvent the versi

Bug#1056874: python-srsly: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2024-11-21 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:18:07PM +0100, s3v wrote: > Seems like python-catalogue 2.0.10 is newer than 2.1.0 :( [1] > After packaging python-catalogue 2.0.10 as 2.1.1+really2.0.10 (I didn't know > how > to circumvent the version problem, sorry if this procedure is not > appropriate!), I fixed t

Bug#1056874: python-srsly: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2024-02-01 Thread s3v
Dear Maintainer, Seems like python-catalogue 2.0.10 is newer than 2.1.0 :( [1] After packaging python-catalogue 2.0.10 as 2.1.1+really2.0.10 (I didn't know how to circumvent the version problem, sorry if this procedure is not appropriate!), and cloning your git repo from salsa, tests still fail: