Bug#1051819: fluidsynth: Consider building with pipewire support

2023-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, i did nmu because... 1) riscv64 porting is finishing and they need to build as many packages as possible (this one was blocking a lot of packages) 2) im in vac now for more than one week, and i wont have access to laptop or so Sorry for the rush and indeed feel free to change everything as

Bug#1051819: fluidsynth: Consider building with pipewire support

2023-09-16 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi Nicholas, Quoting Nicholas D Steeves (2023-09-16 14:06:00) > Oh my, yes, it seems I forgot to add the new pipewire -dev package to the > fluidsynth -dev package. 'not sure how that happened, but my mistake! Isn't > only waiting 48h a bit rushed for an NMU though? the number of delayed days a

Bug#1051819: fluidsynth: Consider building with pipewire support

2023-09-16 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Gianfranco, Oh my, yes, it seems I forgot to add the new pipewire -dev package to the fluidsynth -dev package. 'not sure how that happened, but my mistake! Isn't only waiting 48h a bit rushed for an NMU though? I can of course import your fix and upload in the next 48h, and I'd like to improv

Bug#1051819: fluidsynth: Consider building with pipewire support

2023-09-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: tags 1051819 + patch Control: tags 1051819 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for fluidsynth (versioned as 2.3.3-2.1) and uploaded it. Regards. diff -Nru fluidsynth-2.3.3/debian/changelog fluidsynth-2.3.3/debian/changelog --- fluidsynth-2.3.3/debian/changelog 2023-09-13

Bug#1051819: fluidsynth: Consider building with pipewire support

2023-09-14 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Control: affects -1 + src:ardour src:blockattack src:calf src:chocolate-doom src:crispy-doom src:denemo src:fluidsynth-dssi src:freedink src:frotz src:gambas3 src:gargoyle-free src:gst-plugins-bad1.0 src:jag src:pianobooster src:planetblupi src:qsynth src:qtads src:scummvm src:toppler src:ufoai