Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-02-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Rebecca, Am Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 12:32:07PM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer: > My fixes are pushed to Salsa, but they're in a fork because this isn't a > debian-science package: > https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/influxdb-python Argh, I missed that link inside the bug report and duplica

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
My fixes are pushed to Salsa, but they're in a fork because this isn't a debian-science package: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/influxdb-python

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-01-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Note that this uncertainty is only around whether this is a complete fix - even in the case where it's not, it *wouldn't* be actively worse than doing nothing, though it would be hiding the problem.

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-01-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Some looking through the code suggests that the precision is user-set and hence constant within a single query, and hence that this fix is OK, but I'm not entirely certain of that. There are ways to make pandas 2.x accept mixed time format, but I think they're 2.x _only_ and/or slow.