Le 2023-03-28 05:28, tony mancill a écrit :
The upload is ready. Any concerns?
$ reverse-depends libitext-rups-java
No reverse dependencies found
$ reverse-depends -b libitext-rups-java
No reverse dependencies found
+1 for removing libitext-rups-java, and maybe libitext-rtf-java too.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 07:37:48AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> However, given the low popcon count and the brokenness of the package,
> that may be the best path. If there are users of libitext-rups-java who
> think otherwise, now would be the time to speak up.
>
> ...
>
> Returning to the focu
Hi Jorge,
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:45:32PM -0400, Jorge Moraleda wrote:
> Hello Tony,
>
> I propose that we either reduce the severity, ignore the bug for the
> > bookworm release cycle, or remove only the libitext-rups-java binary
> > package from bookworm.
> >
> Thank you. I believe the appro
Hello Tony,
I propose that we either reduce the severity, ignore the bug for the
> bookworm release cycle, or remove only the libitext-rups-java binary
> package from bookworm.
>
Thank you. I believe the appropriate action is #3 (remove libitext-rups-java
binary
package from bookworm) because it i
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 05:42:12PM -0400, Jorge Moraleda wrote:
> Package: libitext-rups-java
> Version: 2.1.7-13
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> X-Debbugs-Cc: jorge.moral...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The package does not work at all. Based on the following
Package: libitext-rups-java
Version: 2.1.7-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: jorge.moral...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
The package does not work at all. Based on the following Ubuntu bug report it
appears the version packaged is too old to work:
https://bugs
7 matches
Mail list logo
