Santiago Vila wrote:
> And yes, I assume it already works in maintainer mode, but only if mcs is in
> PATH.
The point of distributing the csharpexec-test.exe as a binary is to
be able to have C# support in 'msgunfmt' even when the environment
contains a C# execution engine but no C# compiler.
Br
Santiago Vila wrote:
> For completeness: Would it make sense to add an indication, somewhere, about
> the way
> to create the .exe from the .cs? This is something that surely everybody using
> mono knows, but I had to search for it. I guess this would be correct:
>
> mcs -out:csharpexec-test.exe
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> In practice the main usecase for Mono on Linux is porting of
> proprietary Windows programs to Linux.
>
> > and also isn't it useful for building mobile apps [2]?
>
> "Build cross-platform Android & iOS apps using C# and .NET in Visual
> Studio on Windows and macOS."[3]
>
Hmm, I said:
For completeness: Would it make sense to add an indication, somewhere, about
the way
to create the .exe from the .cs? This is something that surely everybody using
mono knows, but I had to search for it. I guess this would be correct:
Nevermind. I guess this is exactly what cshar
El 26/2/23 a las 11:56, Bruno Haible escribió:
Santiago Vila wrote:
Summary: There is no source for gettext-tools/m4/csharpexec-test.exe.
Fixed through
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gettext.git;a=commitdiff;h=1bda6586b87f7e258c16bd0dca5c43048b9920a9
Thanks a lot!
For completeness:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 11:56:52AM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
>...
> > Note: The Debian package disabled the mono stuff in version 0.17-7 (dated
> > 2009-08-17)
>
> That's a pity. Isn't GNOME using C# [1],
That's really fringe usage.
In practice the main usecase for Mono
Santiago Vila wrote:
> Summary: There is no source for gettext-tools/m4/csharpexec-test.exe.
Fixed through
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gettext.git;a=commitdiff;h=1bda6586b87f7e258c16bd0dca5c43048b9920a9
Thanks for the report.
> Note: The Debian package disabled the mono stuff in vers
but I have not checked
yet how building the package fails if such file is not present. I guess it might
need some Makefile adjustments.
Thanks.
Mensaje reenviado
Asunto: Bug#1031952: gettext: Missing source for an installed windows binary
Fecha: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 21:46:05 +
De: Ba
Package: gettext
Version: 0.21-11
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs upstream
Justification: DFSG #2
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: source-is-missing
X-Debbugs-Cc: ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
your package includes some files that seem to lack sources
in preferred forms of modification:
gettext-
9 matches
Mail list logo
