Hello,
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 05:18, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > I am unsure why you are uploading gdb snapshots for Debian bookworm.
[...]
> It's not a snapshot, it's a release candidate, allowing to read zstd
> compressed
> debug sections and ctf information. Users may expect in a Debian r
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2023 04:20:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1030893: fixed in gdb 13.0.91.20230210-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030893,
regarding gdb FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
> I am unsure why you are uploading gdb snapshots for Debian bookworm.
I tried to reach you on IRC and by email. Getting no reply, I asked your
co-maintainer if he's ok to do that upload. Sergio was ok.
It's not a snapshot, it's a release candidate, allowing to read zstd compressed
debug sect
Hello Matthias,
I am unsure why you are uploading gdb snapshots for Debian bookworm.
In anycase, could you look at this failure, you may need to generate
a DFSG tarball without the GFDL documentation.
Regards
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 21:18, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Source: gdb
> Version: 13.0.91
Source: gdb
Version: 13.0.91-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gdb&ver=13.0.91-0.1
...
make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/build/default/gdb/doc'
(test "ln -s" = "ln -s" && \
ln -s /<>/gdb/doc/all-cfg.texi gdb-cfg.texi) || \
ln /<>/gdb/doc/all-cfg.texi
5 matches
Mail list logo
