Bug#1024221: Bug#1022573: transition: procps

2022-12-22 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote: > That's (in general) sub-optimal for the release team. We try hard to > avoid entangling transitions and therefor we try to finish transitions > sooner rather than later. My preference would be that you NMU (minimal > changes) now; the maintainer

Bug#1024221: Bug#1022573: transition: procps

2022-12-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Craig, On 22-12-2022 00:28, Craig Small wrote: BUT, procps is in transition and this linking needs to happen before the first freeze milestone so I will upload 20220525 linked to libproc2 if we get near to running out of time. That's (in general) sub-optimal for the release team. We try ha

Bug#1024221: Bug#1022573: transition: procps

2022-12-21 Thread Craig Small
(added the bug report for igt) On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 08:29, Craig Small wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 07:46, Paul Gevers wrote: > >> An actual upload. If the maintainer isn't doing it, I think an NMU is >> appropriate if you're sure of the fix. >> > Ah, I thought you were the igt maintainer :