Bug#1021193: marked as done (binutils-arm-none-eabi ftbfs)

2022-10-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
ontact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1021193: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021193 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:binutils-arm-none-eabi Version: 17 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm s

Bug#1021193:

2022-10-25 Thread Keith Packard
I looked for exactly this bug as I fixed the same issue in binutils-riscv-unknown-elf today, but somehow I missed it. This should be fixed in version 18 by using dpkg-query instead of hand-hacked shell bits: upstream_version := $(shell dpkg-query -W -f="\$${source:Upstream-Version}\n" binutils-

Processed: binutils-arm-none-eabi: diff for NMU version 17+nmu1 (was: Bug#1021193: binutils-arm-none-eabi ftbfs)

2022-10-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1021193 + patch pending Bug #1021193 [src:binutils-arm-none-eabi] binutils-arm-none-eabi ftbfs Added tag(s) patch and pending. > user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was de

Bug#1021193: binutils-arm-none-eabi: diff for NMU version 17+nmu1 (was: Bug#1021193: binutils-arm-none-eabi ftbfs)

2022-10-16 Thread Christoph Biedl
tags 1021193 + patch pending user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org usertags 1021193 + bsp-2022-10-de-karlsruhe thank you Matthias Klose wrote... > setting deb_upstream_version in debian/rules fails: Well, that was a low-hanging fruit. The updated code copied the behaviour as found in /usr/share/d

Bug#1021193: binutils-arm-none-eabi ftbfs

2022-10-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:binutils-arm-none-eabi Version: 17 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm setting deb_upstream_version in debian/rules fails: $ echo 2.39-1+17 | cut -d. -f1-3 2.39-1+17 That should work as well: $ echo 2.39-1ubuntu1+17ubuntu1 | cut -d. -f1-3 2.39-1ubuntu1+17ubuntu1 using | sed