Bug#1008653: backintime-qt broken in sid after python upgrade

2022-04-25 Thread Bastian Germann
On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 22:17:17 +0200 Fabio Fantoni wrote: I also prepared an NMU upload on mentors and open RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009834 I sponsored this. NMU debdiff is attached.diff -Nru backintime-1.2.1/CHANGES backintime-1.3.2/CHANGES --- backintime-1.2.1/C

Bug#1008653: backintime-qt broken in sid after python upgrade

2022-04-24 Thread Fabio Fantoni
I missed to reply here, one week ago I prepared and tested an MR with the latest upstream version: https://salsa.debian.org/jmw/pkg-backintime/-/merge_requests/2 I also prepared an NMU upload on mentors and open RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009834 OpenPGP_signatu

Bug#1008653: backintime-qt broken in sid after python upgrade

2022-04-21 Thread Agustin Martin
El jue, 21 abr 2022 a las 23:47, Agustin Martin () escribió: > If a new upstream version contains many changes that maintainer wants > to inspect closely, it is trivial to just include upstream fix for > this issue. I am attaching a patch (with unclosed changelog formatted > for NMU, modify as appr

Processed: Bug#1008653: backintime-qt broken in sid after python upgrade

2022-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch fixed-upstream Bug #1008653 [backintime-qt] backintime-qt broken in sid after python upgrade Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch. -- 1008653: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008653 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Bug#1008653: backintime-qt broken in sid after python upgrade

2022-04-21 Thread Agustin Martin
Control: tags -1 + patch fixed-upstream On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 09:45:26AM +0200, Leonardo Canducci wrote: > Package: backintime-qt > Followup-For: Bug #1008653 > > I've installed backintime-qt from github (it's pretty straightforward, > just donwload the source and build two deb files with the pr