Hi,
17/05/2022 19:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz :
Hello Agathe!
On 5/17/22 18:48, Agathe Porte wrote:
I do not know when that was done, but the two latest Fedora releases have been
using >=35
versions which properly support OpenSSL 3.0 [1]. I have opened #1011155 in
order to discuss
why we c
Hello Agathe!
On 5/17/22 18:48, Agathe Porte wrote:
> I do not know when that was done, but the two latest Fedora releases have
> been using >=35
> versions which properly support OpenSSL 3.0 [1]. I have opened #1011155 in
> order to discuss
> why we cannot just update to latest upstream version
Hi,
17/05/2022 08:43, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz :
Hi!
Looks like an upgrade to at least v35.0.0 is needed to fix this issue:
https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/7039#issuecomment-1088566628=
Not necessarily. One of the Python core developers, Christian Heimes, actually
backported fixe
Control: reopen -1
On 5/17/22 08:50, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I just noticed the patches for OpenSSL 3.0 support have already been added to
> the
> Debian package [1]. I also verified that the package builds fine in unstable
> with OpenSSL 3.0.
>
> Therefore closing this bug report.
H
Hi!
> Looks like an upgrade to at least v35.0.0 is needed to fix this issue:
> https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/7039#issuecomment-1088566628=
Not necessarily. One of the Python core developers, Christian Heimes, actually
backported fixes for Python3.10 and OpenSSL 3.0.0 for Fedora [1]
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 22:13:59 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> Source: python-cryptography
> Version: 3.4.8-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: bookworm sid
> User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
> control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pyca/cryptogra
6 matches
Mail list logo
