Hi
On 2021-11-25 13:22:12, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-11-25 at 12:26:29 +0100, [EXT] Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > [Cc Sebastian Ramacher]
> >
> > On 2021-11-25 21:42:48 +1100, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 03:39, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2021-11-24 16:3
[Cc Sebastian Ramacher]
On 2021-11-25 21:42:48 +1100, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 03:39, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-11-24 16:31:08 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > The symlinks must be kept for backwards compat. Please see #998169 for
> > > the context of this packag
On 2021-11-24 16:31:08 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The symlinks must be kept for backwards compat. Please see #998169 for
> the context of this packaging cleanup.
OK, thanks. #998169 gives the explanation.
Note that I was also wondering whether these symblinks are still
actually used. For insta
On 2021-11-24 15:16:12 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2021-11-23 17:55:54 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Nice cleanup with the odbc packaging! Unfortunately the new
> > transitional package looks a bit broken. It contains a dangling
> > symlink:
> >
> > $ ls -la /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/li
On 2021-11-23 17:55:54 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Nice cleanup with the odbc packaging! Unfortunately the new
> transitional package looks a bit broken. It contains a dangling
> symlink:
>
> $ ls -la /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libodbccr.so.1
> ls: cannot access '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lib
5 matches
Mail list logo
