again :-)
BTW in debian package versions < 1.2.x (debian stable, old stable), all
these bugs are not applicable, I'm going to create the needed ones, If I
have some troubles I will ask for some help, if you don't mind, of course.
Thanks a lot, really.
Great job Team!
Cheers,
Sil
about this, but I need
to know the implications or which is the best option.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Regards,
Sils
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640297
[2] http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=13191
[3]
https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/commit/d00745f5e267eba4ca34286
.
Best regards,
Sils
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/mantis.git;a=commit;h=6f1499b9623acab6b89ee940d4af54dcff746b44
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t, at all. That's another reason because it's not
accessible|blocked from our distributed version.
The application of the patch made sence because we distribute the
upstream source code, but it is useless for mantis package installed in
debian.
Thanks all of you, again.
Best Regards,
Si
found 595510 1.1.8+dfsg-5
found 595510 1.1.6+dfsg-2lenny1
forwarded 595510 http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=12230
tag 595510 +patch
thanks
Hi all,
Sorry, it was a misunderstanding.
As referenced in [0], reported by Secunia, SA40832 [1] (which refers to
(CVE-2010-2574 [2]), there is an XS
version 595510 1.2.x
forwarded 595510 http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=12312
thanks
Hi,
I tested this issue under version 1.1.6+dfsg-2lenny1 (lenny),
1.1.8+dfsg-5 (sid) and 1.2.1-1 (being packaged, soon in experimental),
so I am reassigning this issue to version 1.2.x
This bug does not
6 matches
Mail list logo
