Bug#1103757: FTBFS on ppc64el

2025-04-22 Thread Rafael Laboissière
e problem comes from the ppc64el port of FFmpeg and not from the octave-video package per se. I will fill a bug report againt the ffmpeg package, accordingly. Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1103594: marked as pending in octave-image

2025-04-22 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103594 in octave-image reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-image/-/commit/f0e2e212f4fcfd

Bug#1094884: mathgl FTBFS with numpy 2

2025-03-13 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/mathgl/bugs/53/ * Adrian Bunk [2025-02-01 02:04]: Source: mathgl Version: 8.0.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=mathgl&ver=8.0.2-4%2Bb1 ... /build/reproducible-path/mathgl-8.0.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gn

Bug#1098585: marked as pending in octave-ncarray

2025-03-10 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1098585 in octave-ncarray reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-ncarray/-/commit/c9a631d5ce

Bug#1092433: marked as pending in mwrap

2025-03-09 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1092433 in mwrap reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/mwrap/-/commit/25746cb3ce247f3fbd4d8e7e124b

Bug#1094696: FTBFS on all architectures

2025-02-03 Thread Rafael Laboissière
-dependency-on-numpy-abi I uploaded the package to unstable, anyway. Best, Rafael

Bug#1091873: octave-statistics: flaky autopkgtest: seems to hang and times out

2025-01-16 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Hi Paul, I discussed in private with Sébastien. We are the two main maintainers of the Octave-related packages. It happens that none of us has enough free time now to debug the issue. I suggest that we simply disable the problematic tests, for now. What do you think? Best, Rafael * Paul

Bug#1091121: plplot: FTBFS: plplotcPYTHON_wrap.c:7070:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘t_output_helper’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2025-01-08 Thread Rafael Laboissière
fixed. Best, Rafael * Lucas Nussbaum [2024-12-22 17:49]: Source: plplot Version: 5.15.0+dfsg2-11 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20241222 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to

Bug#1077929: praat: flaky autopkgtest on several architectures: test_Formant_slopes.praat times out

2024-12-05 Thread Rafael Laboissière
ut Could you please confirm whether the problem persists in version 6.4.23+dfsg-1 of the package? Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1088719: librsb: FTBFS: gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:920: qtests] Error 1

2024-12-01 Thread Rafael Laboissière
ng "\\" by "\newline" does indeed fix the building problem. I will soon release a new version of the package. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1084311: marked as pending in octave-symbolic

2024-11-10 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1084311 in octave-symbolic reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-symbolic/-/commit/0fbb5b72

Bug#1083243: octave-geometry: pkg errors on load

2024-10-12 Thread Rafael Laboissière
ave-matgeom, which is a dependency for octave-geometry. The command "pkg load matgeom" fails in a similar way. I am hereby reassigning and changing the title accordingly. Best, Rafael

Bug#1084311: octave-symbolic: FTBFS: Some tests failed. Giving up...

2024-10-07 Thread Rafael Laboissière
version of SymPy (1.13.3). It worked with the previous version 1.13.2. I have forwarded this bug report upstream. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1073431: marked as pending in octave-symbolic

2024-06-20 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073431 in octave-symbolic reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-symbolic/-/commit/cb1a16ff

Bug#1073431: octave-symbolic: FTBFS: ValueError: octoutput does not know how to export type

2024-06-20 Thread Rafael Laboissière
the bug title accordingly. Both problems have been reported upstream: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?65899 https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?65900 Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1072134: marked as pending in octave-financial

2024-05-29 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1072134 in octave-financial reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-financial/-/commit/600ea7

Bug#1069477: marked as pending in octave-stk

2024-05-23 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1069477 in octave-stk reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-stk/-/commit/a9bd03a4eda9ba5b90

Bug#1070994: src:praat: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, ppc64el and riscv64

2024-05-16 Thread Rafael Laboissière
I just realize that I forgot the "Control:" header in my previous message. At any rate, after verifying that the package builds correctly in a armhf chroot on abel.debian.org, I gave back the build on the armhf autobuilders and the package did not FTBFS this time. Best, Rafael L

Bug#1070994: src:praat: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, ppc64el and riscv64

2024-05-14 Thread Rafael Laboissière
. Best, Rafael * Paul Gevers [2024-05-12 18:51]: Source: praat Version: 6.4.05+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and

Bug#1070994: marked as pending in praat

2024-05-13 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1070994 in praat reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/praat/-/commit/4bc9983356bccecef97c445d8357b1be533

Bug#1066594: octave-iso2mesh: FTBFS: nl_single_file.c:2505:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘lsame_’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-04-02 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Qianqian Fang [2024-03-29 10:52]: On 3/29/24 01:24, Rafael Laboissière wrote: It seems so. If we fix Bug#1066594, then both octave-iso2mesh and octave-brain2mesh will be able to migrate into testing. thanks Rafael, replying to #1066594 it looks like someone from Fedora had submitted a

Bug#1067327: marked as pending in octave-statistics

2024-03-22 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1067327 in octave-statistics reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-statistics/-/commit/fa9a

Bug#1065548: marked as pending in octave-statistics

2024-03-08 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1065548 in octave-statistics reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-statistics/-/commit/88b9

Bug#1065548: marked as pending in octave-statistics

2024-03-06 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1065548 in octave-statistics reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-statistics/-/commit/5d7e

Bug#1062613: librsb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Hello Steve, * Rafael Laboissière [2024-02-02 18:19]: Control: tags -1 - upstream * Steve Langasek [2024-02-02 08:48]: On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:06:38PM +0100, Rafael Laboissière wrote: Control: tags -1 + upstream Thanks for this bug report and for the upload to experimental, Steve

Bug#1063045: vibes: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Thanks, Steve. I have added your changes to Git [*] Best, Rafael Laboissière [*] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/vibes/-/commit/566014ea0e7b29684b4391fbabd3ae5b8090c6e8 * Steve Langasek [2024-02-04 17:47]: Source: vibes Version: 0.2.3+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid

Bug#1062613: librsb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-02 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tags -1 - upstream * Steve Langasek [2024-02-02 08:48]: On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:06:38PM +0100, Rafael Laboissière wrote: Control: tags -1 + upstream Thanks for this bug report and for the upload to experimental, Steve. I am hereby forwarding your message to the upstream

Bug#1062613: librsb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-02 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tags -1 + upstream Thanks for this bug report and for the upload to experimental, Steve. I am hereby forwarding your message to the upstream author. Best, Rafael Laboissière * Steve Langasek [2024-02-02 06:09]: Source: librsb Version: 1.3.0.2+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Tags

Bug#1061011: marked as pending in octave-zeromq

2024-01-17 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1061011 in octave-zeromq reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-zeromq/-/commit/412ae7c14447

Bug#1060999: marked as pending in octave-sockets

2024-01-17 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1060999 in octave-sockets reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-sockets/-/commit/44fae34e9d

Bug#1059040: libxml2: ABI change? (undefined references)

2024-01-12 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Thorsten Glaser [2024-01-12 17:56]: On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, Rafael Laboissière wrote: experimental, the configure script does detect the absence of the xmlNanoFTPNewCtxt function in the libxml2 library (version 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1) and disables the call to the xmlNanoFTP* functions. However

Bug#1059040: libxml2: ABI change? (undefined references)

2024-01-11 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Rafael * Rene Engelhard [2023-12-25 23:48]: Hi, Am 25.12.23 um 22:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard: I didn't file it for the plain build issue. Nevertheless, if it broke so many projects you probably should do a full-fledged rebuild and send Well, mitigated by 2.12.3, but still. But

Bug#1013584: octave-iso2mesh: FTBFS: dh_missing: error: missing files, aborting

2024-01-06 Thread Rafael Laboissière
and released version 1.9.6+ds-8 with eh proposed "fix" (adding debian/not-installed). Actually, this is not the right thing to do, since the files in debian/tmp/usr/share/octave/packages/ should go into the binary package octave-iso2mesh. I am hereby rectifying the situation. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1055228: Bug#1055750: Bug#1055228: plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)

2024-01-01 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: severity -1 important * Sebastiaan Couwenberg [2024-01-01 20:13]: plplot got removed from armhf, the severity of this issue could be lowered to important to not have the package removed from testing. Thanks, I am doing it hereby. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1059652: Proposed-RM: slpvm -- RoQA; PVM no longer maintained

2023-12-31 Thread Rafael Laboissière
also unmaintained. If there are no objections, I'll reassign this bug to the FTP team. I'll wait at least two weeks, i.e., at least until 2024-01-13; though it might take longer until I look at this again. Please, reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org. Thanks for your QA work. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1057591: octave-vibes: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-25 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Rafael Laboissière [2023-12-22 04:36]: * Sébastien Villemot [2023-12-21 15:23]: Le jeudi 21 décembre 2023 à 08:49 +0100, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : * Santiago Vila [2023-12-20 22:03]: El 20/12/23 a las 21:08, Rafael Laboissière escribió: HOME := $(shell mktemp -d) so that the same

Bug#1057591: octave-vibes: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-21 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Sébastien Villemot [2023-12-21 15:23]: Le jeudi 21 décembre 2023 à 08:49 +0100, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : * Santiago Vila [2023-12-20 22:03]: El 20/12/23 a las 21:08, Rafael Laboissière escribió: HOME := $(shell mktemp -d) so that the same directory is never used twice between

Bug#1057591: octave-vibes: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-20 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Santiago Vila [2023-12-20 22:03]: El 20/12/23 a las 21:08, Rafael Laboissière escribió: HOME := $(shell mktemp -d) so that the same directory is never used twice between consecutive builds. Yes, this is a much better solution. Thanks for the suggestion. I am just wondering: is there a

Bug#1057591: octave-vibes: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-20 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Santiago Vila [2023-12-20 13:43]: El 16/12/23 a las 22:30, Rafael Laboissière escribió: I did the investigation again, using pbuilder. Here is what I found: – In my case, pbuilder sets HOME=/nonexistent/ and debhelper (compat level = 13) keeps that setting. Hence, the package FTBFS. – If

Bug#1057590: Request for action on Bug#1057589, Bug#1057590, and Bug#1058281

2023-12-19 Thread Rafael Laboissière
possible to check the build of octave-netcdf and octave-ncarray on your systems, such that we can close the bug reports? Best, Rafael

Bug#1057591: octave-vibes: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-16 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Rafael Laboissière [2023-12-15 21:44]: * Santiago Vila [2023-12-15 18:15]: The thing I don't understand here is why this problem in octave-vibes was diagnosed as an "unwritable $HOME" in the first place. This is what I concluded after running some tests, but I do no

Bug#1057591: octave-vibes: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-15 Thread Rafael Laboissière
cate it. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1058281: octave-ncarray: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:5: binary] Error 139

2023-12-15 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: block -1 by 1058621 Control: merge -1 1057590 Trying again…

Bug#1057591: octave-vibes: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-15 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Rafael * Santiago Vila [2023-12-15 12:59]: El 13/12/23 a las 9:27, Rafael Laboissière escribió: i.e. you may rely on a writable $HOME if it's for a "good cause" (i.e. dh_auto_test). So, the simple question: Should this not be also implemented in dh_octave_check as well

Bug#1058281: octave-ncarray: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:5: binary] Error 139

2023-12-15 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: blocked -1 by 1058621 Control: merge -1 1057590 I hope that the merge goes well this time. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1058281: octave-ncarray: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:5: binary] Error 139

2023-12-14 Thread Rafael Laboissière
...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Thanks for this bug report, but the issue has been already reported. I am hereby reassigning and merging this bug report. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1057589: Reassign Bug#1057589 and merge it with #1057590

2023-12-13 Thread Rafael Laboissière
reassign 1057589 src:octave-netcdf merge 1057589 1057590 stop

Bug#1057591: octave-vibes: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-13 Thread Rafael Laboissière
re at it, the Policy paragraph that you quoted: The Debian autobuilders set HOME to /nonexistent so that packages which try to write to a home directory will fail to build. would probably need to be reworded a little bit. I agree. I think that a bug report should be filed against debian-policy

Bug#1057589: octave-ncarray: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-08 Thread Rafael Laboissière
, on which octave-ncarray depends. I am hereby merging the present bug report with Bug#1057590 Best, Rafael Laboissière * Santiago Vila [2023-12-05 23:08]: Package: src:octave-ncarray Version: 1.0.5-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in

Bug#1057590: octave-netcdf: FTBFS: fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...

2023-12-08 Thread Rafael Laboissière
package failed to build: [snip] fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself... Segmentation fault Thanks for the bug report. It seems to be an upstream problem. I have forwarded the bug to the upstream developers. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1057588: marked as pending in octave-nan

2023-12-06 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1057588 in octave-nan reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-nan/-/commit/6e1b193838a252d42b

Bug#1055228: Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#1055750: Bug#1055228: plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)

2023-11-21 Thread Rafael Laboissière
severity 1055750 serious merge 1055750 1055228

Bug#1055228: Bug#1055750: Bug#1055228: plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)

2023-11-21 Thread Rafael Laboissière
t think we have any reasons to believe the compiler is at fault really. Thanks for the suggestion, Emanuele. I am hereby merging both bugs, which are now both assigned to plplot. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1055228: plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)

2023-11-10 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Rafael Laboissière [2023-11-09 17:11]: [snip] There may be a programming error in x09f.f90 or this may be a problem with gfortran on armhf. My knowledge of Fortran is almost non existent and I will need the help of experts, in order to fix the issue. Regarding this issue, I filed a bug

Bug#1055228: plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)

2023-11-09 Thread Rafael Laboissière
rivate function (mypltr) of the x09f program. There may be a programming error in x09f.f90 or this may be a problem with gfortran on armhf. My knowledge of Fortran is almost non existent and I will need the help of experts, in order to fix the issue. Best, Rafael Laboissière [1] https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/?id=1d46b351f [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054583

Bug#1053314: Depends: python3-h5py-mpi without python3-h5py

2023-10-10 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Rafael Laboissière [2023-10-09 08:30]: […] At least, I hope that version 3.1.0+dfsg2-5 will really fix Bug#1053314 and the h5py transition will be completed. Unfortunately, it is still not working: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/x/xmds2/38836874/log.gz I guess that

Bug#1053314: Depends: python3-h5py-mpi without python3-h5py

2023-10-08 Thread Rafael Laboissière
upstream authors, to know what they thing. Let us see how things evolve. At least, I hope that version 3.1.0+dfsg2-5 will really fix Bug#1053314 and the h5py transition will be completed. Best, Rafael * Drew Parsons [2023-10-09 02:23]: Nilesh explained most of the situation correctly. I can

Bug#1052973: marked as done (octave-image: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Error 1)

2023-10-08 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Sébastien Villemot [2023-10-07 08:23]: Hi Rafael, Le samedi 07 octobre 2023 à 14:15 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : I have a question for the Debian Octave Group, related to Bug#1052973, which has been fixed in version 8.3.0-3 of octave-dev. This bug was preventing the building of the

Bug#1053314: Depends: python3-h5py-mpi without python3-h5py

2023-10-08 Thread Rafael Laboissière
_debian_h5py_serial' from partially initialized module 'h5py' (most likely due to a circular import) (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/h5py/__init__.py) Is there a way to force h5py to import _debian_h5py_serial instead of _debian_h5py_mpi, via the generic h5py namespace? Best, Rafael *

Bug#1053314: Depends: python3-h5py-mpi without python3-h5py

2023-10-08 Thread Rafael Laboissière
: libhdf5-serial-dev Should that instead be Depends: libhdf5-mpi-dev ? Seems you're right, taking a brief look at it. I've CC'ed Rafael to further comment/upload a fix. @Rafael, this seems to be the last blocker on h5py transition to testing, so prompt action would be really co

Bug#1052973: marked as done (octave-image: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Error 1)

2023-10-07 Thread Rafael Laboissière
est, Rafael * Debian Bug Tracking System [2023-09-30 19:09]: Your message dated Sat, 30 Sep 2023 19:04:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1052973: fixed in octave 8.3.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1052973, regarding octave-image: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Erro

Bug#1052973: marked as pending in octave

2023-09-30 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1052973 in octave reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave/-/commit/bbc6c896b88490baec1531363a

Bug#1052973: octave-image: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Error 1

2023-09-28 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: reassign -1 octave-dev 8.3.0-1 Control: affects -1 octave-image Control: notfound -1 octave-image/2.14.0-4 Control: forwarded -1 https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?64725 * Rafael Laboissière [2023-09-26 22:00]: Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream * Lucas Nussbaum [2023-09-26

Bug#1052973: octave-image: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Error 1

2023-09-26 Thread Rafael Laboissière
, in the way it process its arguments, between versions 8.2 and 8.3 of Octave. I will try to get to this, as time permits. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1042933: octave-statistics autopkg tests fail in unstable on amd64

2023-08-31 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Rafael Laboissière [2023-08-31 15:01]: * Sébastien Villemot [2023-08-31 12:05]: Le jeudi 03 août 2023 à 08:33 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : Just for the record, this is the offending unit test: 308s [inst/ConfusionMatrixChart.m] 308s >>>>> /tmp/

Bug#1042933: octave-statistics autopkg tests fail in unstable on amd64

2023-08-31 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Sébastien Villemot [2023-08-31 12:05]: Le jeudi 03 août 2023 à 08:33 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : Just for the record, this is the offending unit test: 308s [inst/ConfusionMatrixChart.m] 308s >>>>> /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.9x_h6bvs/downtmp/bui

Bug#1050796: marked as pending in octave-interval

2023-08-30 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1050796 in octave-interval reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-interval/-/commit/c3c5d11d

Bug#1050796: octave-interval tests need an update with mpfr4 4.2.1

2023-08-29 Thread Rafael Laboissière
upstream version of interval package for Octave is released soon. If not, I will released a patched version of octave-interval. Best, Rafael Laboissière * Matthias Klose [2023-08-29 12:20]: Package: octave-interval Version: 3.2.1-5 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie Forwarded: https

Bug#1042933: octave-statistics autopkg tests fail in unstable on amd64

2023-08-02 Thread Rafael Laboissière
308s ! test failed 308s set: "cameratarget" must be finite 308s shared variables visibility_setting = on 308s 1 test, 0 passed, 0 known failure, 0 skipped We have seen this problem already elsewhere. I will try to investigate it. Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1042007: marked as pending in octave-sockets

2023-07-26 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1042007 in octave-sockets reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-sockets/-/commit/01a5e45e1a

Bug#1036096: marked as pending in jed

2023-05-16 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1036096 in jed reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/jed/-/commit/8541ffd990b36dd9c326326a284d21b06a909234

Bug#1035839: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Rafael Laboissière ) (Bug#1035839: fixed in jed 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-4)

2023-05-10 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Great, thanks for your help! * Axel Beckert [2023-05-10 13:20]: Hi Rafael, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: jed (1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * d/jed-common.preinst: Avoid non-fatal abortion of the script. Thanks to Axel Beckert for the fix (Closes

Bug#1035692: marked as pending in jed

2023-05-08 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1035692 in jed reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/jed/-/commit/40d282d560572a7807e19cc92240b285c7642cdc

Bug#1016332: librsb: FTBFS: gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:920: qtests] Error 1

2022-12-06 Thread Rafael Laboissière
build goes fine, will this bug report be automatically closed? Otherwise, is there a web page where the results can be tracked? Best, Rafael

Bug#1025501: pvm: Uninstallable in sid when openssh-client is installed

2022-12-06 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Rafael Laboissière [2022-12-06 10:08]: * Rafael Laboissière [2022-12-05 22:55]: The pvm package is currently installable in sid when openssh-client is installed and there is no other package providing rsh-client: Of course, I meant *uninstallable* in the sentence above. The pvm package

Bug#1025501: pvm: Uninstallable in sid when openssh-client is installed

2022-12-06 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Rafael Laboissière [2022-12-05 22:55]: The pvm package is currently installable in sid when openssh-client is installed and there is no other package providing rsh-client: Of course, I meant *uninstallable* in the sentence above. The pvm package is orphaned. If nobody objects, I will do a

Bug#1025501: pvm: Uninstallable in sid when openssh-client is installed

2022-12-05 Thread Rafael Laboissière
stop providing rsh-client (closes: #197037). A simple fix for this issue is changing the Depends field from: openssh-client | rsh-client to: rsh-client Best, Rafael -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'),

Bug#1016332: librsb: FTBFS: gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:920: qtests] Error 1

2022-12-05 Thread Rafael Laboissière
ef texlive-latex-extra is one of the dependencies of doxygen-latex, which is a build-dependency of librsb. In conclusion, I do not think that the problem is caused by using the utf8x option for the LaTeX package inputenc. Best, Rafael

Bug#1016332: librsb: FTBFS: gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:920: qtests] Error 1

2022-12-04 Thread Rafael Laboissière
], I could not find the source of the problem. If you could take a look at this, it will be great. Best, Rafael [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1016332 [2] http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/07/28/librsb_1.3.0.1+dfsg-2_unstable.log * Lucas Nussbaum [2022-07-29 20:37]: Source: librsb Version: 1.3.

Bug#962650: libcamera now maintaines proper sonames

2022-10-14 Thread Rafael Diniz
://git.libcamera.org/libcamera/libcamera.git/commit/?id=1bd14fc8954425ac310d24876c6257f0b80c4880 meson: Shared Object version handling https://git.libcamera.org/libcamera/libcamera.git/commit/?id=0aac297afd0cf2748c20f919bdd8d5e390b8d9a8 Kind regards, Rafael Diniz OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP

Bug#1004770: marked as pending in octave-video

2022-09-14 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1004770 in octave-video reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-video/-/commit/3f5d2b913256ec

Bug#1004770: octave-video: Use this patch instead

2022-08-14 Thread Rafael Laboissière
. Best, Rafael * Rafael Laboissière [2022-08-13 12:17]: Complementing my message below, the unit test in inst/VideWriter.m passed successfully when the sources were compiled against ffmpeg 4, for instance in this build: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=octave-video&arch=amd64

Bug#1004770: octave-video: Use this patch instead

2022-08-13 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Complementing my message below, the unit test in inst/VideWriter.m passed successfully when the sources were compiled against ffmpeg 4, for instance in this build: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=octave-video&arch=amd64&ver=2.0.2-1%2Bb2&stamp=1650535691&

Bug#1004770: octave-video: Use this patch instead

2022-08-13 Thread Rafael Laboissière
ion __writer_open__, defined in src/cap_ffmpeg_wrapper.cc. Do you experience the same problem in your system? Best, Rafael Laboissière

Bug#1013604: marked as pending in octave-communications

2022-06-26 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1013604 in octave-communications reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-communications/-/com

Bug#1013589: marked as pending in octave-interval

2022-06-26 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1013589 in octave-interval reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-interval/-/commit/1c46aac2

Bug#984148: [PATCH] Re: gcc-avr: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-10-24 Thread Rafael Laboissière
find_reloads, defined in file gcc/gcc/reload.c, which accepts an integer as third argument. Caveat: I did not do extensive tests to check for side effects of this change. Best, Rafael Laboissière --- gcc-avr-5.4.0+Atmel3.6.2.orig/gcc/gcc/reload.h +++ gcc-avr-5.4.0+Atmel3.6.2/gcc/gcc/reload.h @@ -168,7

Bug#983993: [PATCH] Re: binutils-avr: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-10-23 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Attached to this message is a trivial patch that makes the binutils-avr package build correctly against GCC 11. Best, Rafael Laboissière --- binutils-avr-2.26.20160125+Atmel3.6.2.orig/binutils/bfd/plugin.c +++ binutils-avr-2.26.20160125+Atmel3.6.2/binutils/bfd/plugin.c @@ -338,7 +338,7

Bug#979458: Reassigning, merging and rising severity level of Bugs #979458 and #979459

2021-08-26 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Rafael Laboissière [2021-08-25 13:43]: * Wookey [2021-08-25 12:30]: On 24/08/2021 07:45, Rafael Laboissière wrote: I am hereby reassigning the Bugs #979458 and #979459, which were assigned to the binary jed and jed-common packages, to the jed source package. I am also merging this two

Bug#979458: Reassigning, merging and rising severity level of Bugs #979458 and #979459

2021-08-25 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Wookey [2021-08-25 12:30]: On 24/08/2021 07:45, Rafael Laboissière wrote: I am hereby reassigning the Bugs #979458 and #979459, which were assigned to the binary jed and jed-common packages, to the jed source package. I am also merging this two bug reports and rising their severity level to

Bug#979458: Reassigning, merging and rising severity level of Bugs #979458 and #979459

2021-08-25 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Rafael Laboissière [2021-08-24 08:45]: […] The trivial patch that fixes the problem is attached to this message. Please, consider rather the patch that is attached to the present message. The jed-common.prerm script must honor the failed-upgrade argument, since the script in version 1

Bug#979459: Reassigning, merging and rising severity level of Bugs #979458 and #979459

2021-08-24 Thread Rafael Laboissière
binary jed and jed-common packages, to the jed source package. I am also merging this two bug reports and rising their severity level to serious. The trivial patch that fixes the problem is attached to this message. Best, Rafael Laboissière P.S.: Note that removing the jed-common package from a

Bug#991330: marked as pending in octave-zeromq

2021-07-22 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #991330 in octave-zeromq reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-zeromq/-/commit/41c43602a666b

Bug#976385: marked as pending in octave-vibes

2021-01-02 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #976385 in octave-vibes reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-vibes/-/commit/3784be9e9a7eb6f

Bug#977357: marked as pending in libgdf

2020-12-28 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #977357 in libgdf reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/neurodebian-team/libgdf/-/commit/e1ecf1858c67cdf55bc1520493

Bug#976325: [ans...@debian.org: Bug#976325: src:libgdf: invalid maintainer address]

2020-12-07 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Yaroslav Halchenko [2020-12-07 11:06]: mail server is back online so we are back to enjoying all the mail ;-) Thanks ! Rafael

Bug#976436: marked as pending in octave-ltfat

2020-12-05 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #976436 in octave-ltfat reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-ltfat/-/commit/b0cb4862e4f8766

Bug#976198: marked as pending in octave-image

2020-12-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #976198 in octave-image reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-image/-/commit/30c72bef7fa4a3b

Bug#976325: [ans...@debian.org: Bug#976325: src:libgdf: invalid maintainer address]

2020-12-03 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Dear Yaroslav and Michael, Are you aware of the problem related in Bug#976325, regarding the email address t...@neuro.debian.net? Best, Rafael Laboissière - Forwarded message from Ansgar - From: Ansgar Subject: Bug#976325: src:libgdf: invalid maintainer address Date: Thu, 03 Dec

Bug#974099: octave-database: diff for NMU version 2.4.4-3.1

2020-11-14 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Sebastian Ramacher [2020-11-14 12:40]: I couldn't push them directly, so I've created a MR: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-database/-/merge_requests/1 Great, thanks. It is merged now. Best, Rafael Laboissière

  1   2   3   4   5   >