Bug#910249: Bumping up encryption to AES-256 by default

2019-03-06 Thread procmem
On 3/5/19 11:49 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:35 PM procmem wrote: >> I stand corrected its in your version since you cherry picked the patch. > Yes. Could you verify whether that version fixes your issue? > > Thanks, > Jeremy Bicha It does indeed. Thanks.

Bug#910249: Bumping up encryption to AES-256 by default

2019-03-05 Thread procmem
I stand corrected its in your versionĀ  since you cherry picked the patch.

Bug#910249: Bumping up encryption to AES-256 by default

2019-03-05 Thread procmem
On 3/5/19 6:16 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > I just uploaded libblockdev 2.20-7. Please check if it fixes your issue. > > If it does, would you be interested in filing the unblock bug to get > the fix in to Debian Buster? > > https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html > > Thanks, > Jeremy B

Bug#910249: Bumping up encryption to AES-256 by default

2018-10-03 Thread procmem
Jeremy Bicha: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:36 PM procmem wrote: >> Package: gnome-disk-utility >> Version: all >> Severity: serious >> >> Hi. I noticed Gnome Disks uses AES-128 by default instead of AES-256 >> like Debian does out of the box. Having 256 bit

Bug#910249: Bumping up encryption to AES-256 by default

2018-10-03 Thread procmem
Package: gnome-disk-utility Version: all Severity: serious Hi. I noticed Gnome Disks uses AES-128 by default instead of AES-256 like Debian does out of the box. Having 256 bit symmetric keys is good practice for long term security especially in a coming era of quantum computers. (Whether they mate

Bug#902237: Feature Request: Package plugin installer separately

2018-06-23 Thread procmem
Package: gajim Version: all Severity: serious Please consider packaging the plugin installer separately (to make its install optional) as it prompts users to update and install additional code from untrusted sources which violates Debian's package security assumptions. (/usr/share/gajim/plugins/p