Will we be seeing this in the next Jessie point release?
The package should be autoremoved by an RC bug, correct?
I see you already filed one; never mind.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:21 PM, oldtechaa wrote:
> So should I file an RM: bug instead to remove it from all suites?
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Schepler
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:06 AM, ol
So should I file an RM: bug instead to remove it from all suites?
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Schepler
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:06 AM, oldtechaa wrote:
> > The package should be autoremoved by an RC bug, correct?
>
> Only from testing. As far as I k
Package: tads2-mode
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.7
Dear Maintainer,
tads2-mode violates Section 7.7 of the Debian Policy Manual, which states that
packages must include dependencies for the clean rule in Build-Depends rather
than Build-Depends-Indep.
This package has a number of oth
5 matches
Mail list logo
