> Package: xfsprogs
> Version: 2.8.11-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> XFS on 32bit Linux cannot mount filesystems >16T see:
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00124.html
>
> xfs_grow will grow a filsystem larger than this which will function
> untill th
Hi Riki,
>> curve.cpp: In static member function 'static double Curve::NaN()':
>> curve.cpp:35: error: 'numeric_limits' is not a member of 'std'
>> curve.cpp:35: error: expected primary-expression before 'double'
>> curve.cpp:35: error: expected ';' before 'double'
>> curve.cpp:35: error: expected
> tags 479687 +patch
> thanks
>
> adding pcp, libglu1-mesa-dev andmesa-common-dev to the
> build-dependencies will make this build (at least on i386 and amd64, I
> don't have any other platforms handy to test).
Thanks Peter. The pcp dependency is not right - thats a packaging issue
in PCP, which
> On 11/03/08 at 10:55 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
>>
>> Can you confirm that procps was _not_ installed in the build chroot
>> for me please? If it is, can you mail me the output from "ps -ef"
>> on a build system?
>
> procps was not installed (it's not an essential or build-essential
> package),
Hi,
Just a quick note to say I'll be downgrading the severity on this bug - as
per
the previous email on the bug, xfs_repair can fix the FS damage. In the long
run, theres also discussion (upstream) of replacing xfs_check entirely by an
"xfs_repair -n" wrapper, which would resolve this issue enti
> On Friday 15 February 2008 09:16, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 22:42 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
>> > Package: xfsprogs
>> > Version: 2.8.11-1
>> > Severity: critical
>> > Justification: breaks the whole system
>>
>> Heh, er, just a tad extreme? (its not clear
6 matches
Mail list logo
