Bug#1087616: confirm linux-image-6.11.7-amd64 boot failure

2024-12-03 Thread Chris Nospam
ian_br...@mail.ru wrote at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:56:25 -0800 > However, having now installed systemd v257~rc3-1, the problem seems to > have gone away, without altering the boot parameters. This is the case > at least with kernel linux-image-6.11.10-amd64. I cannot confirm that. The hang in with syst

Bug#1087616: Aw: Re: Bug#1087616: linux-image-6.11.7-amd64: Can't boot (boot freezes after [or maybe during] cryptsetup unlocks drive)

2024-11-30 Thread Chris Nospam
Dear Salvatore, now up to date with testing's kernel 6.11.10-1 and systemd 257rc3-1, the same issue. In that config I saw the hang even once with my kvm virtualized system. > Would you still as well be able to configure a netconsole so we see if > we get more information of it Of course, howeve

Bug#1087616: linux-image-6.11.7-amd64: Can't boot (boot freezes after [or maybe during] cryptsetup unlocks drive)

2024-11-28 Thread Chris Nospam
Dear Salvatore, that seems to be a wired thing!? No matter of temporarily within grub bootmenu e and F10 or permanently by changing /etc/default/grub and update-grub, as soon I replace kernel parameter quit by -- systemd.log_level=debug the system boots successfully on ever trie. I did mor

Bug#1087616: Can't boot

2024-11-27 Thread Chris Nospam
I also can confirm that booting is not possible in testing any more: Kernel 6.11.9 and 6.11.7 and systemd v257~rc2-3 in a standard grub/efi/ext setup without cryptofs or similar on a sata ssd (so probably better to change the title of the thread). This happens since the upgrade which (among othe

Bug#996670: Bug #998386 Plasma gets very slow when compositor is disabled on bare metal

2021-11-04 Thread Chris Nospam
Hi Norbert, > But I guess you had, or some cosmic radiation induced bit switch did it > for you on your hard disk ;-) The default for all installations is being > on. yeah, then lets say "maybe" or "probably" I did that, nevertheless, at least it was a couple of years ago and I cannot remeber ;-

Bug#996670: libkdecorations2-5v5 migrated to testing too early breaking Plasma

2021-11-04 Thread Chris Nospam
Hi Norbert, thanks to your repsonse! > Can you try/check the following: > * In the Plasma Settings app, go to > Display and Monitor > Compositor > and check whether > Enable compositor on startup > is selected (on). Indeed, turning that switch to on and restarting helps. Great!!!

Bug#996670: libkdecorations2-5v5 migrated to testing too early breaking Plasma

2021-11-04 Thread Chris Nospam
Today all packages of plasma 5.23 migrated to testing, and it works fine in my (libvirt) vm. However, on bare metal mesa makes problems (see my bug report #998386), so in fact there plasma 5.23 stays unusable.

Bug#998386: mesa 21.2.4-1 makes graphical desktop (plasma) unusable

2021-11-04 Thread Chris Nospam
Unfortunately, mesa 21.2.4-1 shows the same problem under plasma 5.23 in testing. The latter has finally migrated to testing with all packages yesterday. The combination works fine within my libvirt vm, as I think, it does not use hw accelleration there. However, on bare metal (see above) it sta

Bug#998386: mesa 21.2.4-1 makes graphical desktop (plasma) unusable

2021-11-03 Thread Chris Nospam
Package: mesa Version: 20.3.5-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks graphical system like KDE After updateing mesa from 20.3.5 to 21.2.4 in bookworm (migrated on October 21th to testing) my graphical KDE plasma 5.21 under x11 renders unusable. Note plasma 5.23 is currently unusable in testi

Bug#996670: libkdecorations2-5v5 migrated to testing too early breaking Plasma

2021-10-23 Thread Chris Nospam
KDE/Plasma (package dependencies) are currently completely broken under testing. Is there currently a chance to (somehow simply) block the partial transition of plasma 5.23 to testing (so that not related package updates are easy)? Selectively upgrading single packages with dependencies one afte

Bug#718593: fatal SIGSEGV error in openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b27-1.12.6-1~deb6u1 since last security update

2013-08-02 Thread nospam
Upon further inspection, it seems that there is something amiss with package dependencies. After manually installing libjpeg8, the jvm crashes no more. But now we have 2 jpeg libs, which seems odd. ii libjpeg626b1-1The Independent JPEG Group's J

Bug#718593: fatal SIGSEGV error in openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b27-1.12.6-1~deb6u1 since last security update

2013-08-02 Thread nospam
Package: openjdk-6-jre-headless Version: 6b27-1.12.6-1~deb6u1 Severity: critical This is new error that occurs since the last security update of openjdk-6-jre-headless (installed on 7/26/2013). This fatal error crashes the jvm. The error occurred at least 3 times in the last 24 hours on diff