>
> This is what I get in systemctl status:
>
> ene 19 13:38:04 named[1020]: ENGINE_by_id failed (crypto failure)
Can you provide a named.conf that reproduces the issue?
thanks,
lamont
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> $ grep lmtp /etc/postfix/master.cf
> lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp
Is there by any chance any trailing whitespace on that line?
lamont
/usr/lib/postfix/sbin
and then I'll be making sure that shlib loading doesn't get to traverse
into the subdirectory.
One way or another, I'd expect that to get uploaded before the weekend
is over. (Targetting Friday sometime, but I've learned to be
conservative in what I commit.)
lamont
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:34:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 08:29:14AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Package: anope
> > Version: 2.0.2-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It cu
Package: anope
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It currently passes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
done automatically.
Postfix does, indeed REQUIRE that name resolution work on the machine.
Therefore, $named is the correct thing to require.
My next bit of investigation will be to look into what Provides: $named
when dnsmasq is NOT installed.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
tag 741285 + moreinfo
--
I'll need someone with kfreebsd to provide a patch.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
of #720813 which was marked
> fixed in 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3 but as far as I can tell from looking at
>
> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20130828T095519Z/pool/main/b/bind9/libbind-dev_9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3_amd64.deb
>
> wasn't.
>
> The bug is marked pending but I can
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
defer_unauth_destination
I need to review the rest of the release notes and see what else I need to
detect and deal with as part of an upgrade.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
ty patch is available,
given how trivial and complete the workaround is.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
to the backport soon, if the security team doesn't beat me to it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:05:06PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:42:11PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > That should be fine, thanks!
> What's the status?
fix-committed,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:38:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Lamont, are you fine with an NMU?
> This bug has been open for a long time and needs to be fixed for Squeeze
> soon.
I have another upload for util-linux that I'm planning doing late this week
or monday. (566072)
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:33:27PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:48:30AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote [edited]:
> > I'll ponder this an get back with you on Monday (US time).
> and? what about my earlier proposal of using debconf only if it happens
it suffices to Depend on
> debconf (as opposed to pre-depend).
I've been trying to avoid _ANY_ debconf dependency in util-linux. I'll ponder
this an get back with you on Monday (US time).
> I'll consider a delayed NMU unless I hear from you real soon now.
Please wait.
lam
ot. Would that be sufficient for you?
> On the other side of the coin, I see no reason to fail to boot
> because a noauto filesystem didn't fsck.
It's more that a filesystem that fstab says to check failed to pass.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@list
n which case, reopening the old bug would have been even more appropriate.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Good point. OTOH, an actual bit of content in the bug would have
helped simplify the work of understanding what your issue was.
lamont
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 04:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Severity: serious
> Package: bind9
> Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg-1
> User:
, which in turn made several systems
> unreachable.
Have you seen this with anything newer than 9.5.1?
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:24:18AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> This source package contains the following files from the
> IETF under non-free license terms:
Nice boilierpate bug. I thought I had gotten all of these, I'll deal with
the rest shortly.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Package: kaa-imlib2
Version: 0.2.3-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kaa-imlib2_0.2.3-2 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20091204-2148
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs (>
Package: hplip
Version: 3.9.10-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of hplip_3.9.10-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20091129-1027
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: libcups2-de
Package: ohcount
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ohcount_3.0.0-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20091129-0148
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper
Package: kbd
Version: 1.15.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kbd_1.15.1-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20091127-1636
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7
Package: collectd
Version: 4.8.1-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of collectd_4.8.1-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20091126-1607
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelp
.
calling something that takes a pointer argument, or returns a pointer
without having a prototype for it is bad.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: jconv
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Depending on the architecture, the name of libc6 is, um, different.
> Automatic build of jconv_0.8.1-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20091105-1957
[...]
> ** Using b
what version of util-linux do
you have installed??
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
h halves of the world.
I completely agree on the severity, and would love to hear from the people
who convinced me this would work. again.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: trousers
Version: 0.3.2-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of trousers_0.3.2-4 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20090831-2304
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelp
Package: dhcpcd
Version: 1:3.2.3-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of dhcpcd_1:3.2.3-3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20090831-2336
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelp
ff in addition to Conflicts.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Signed-off-by: LaMont Jones
OTOH, that commit lacks changes to not stop it on upgrade.
> an even better option is for the bind9 package to actually make some
> effort to minimise downtime by restarting after upgrade rather than
> stopping early and starting late.
And it would appear that I w
has worked reliably for many years with a restart
> after upgrade rather than stop-early, start-late approach. there is no
> reason for the current change in behaviour. it just maximises downtime.
Versions?
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
o using
dh_installinit was done separate from the "don't bother trying to keep
it running through the upgrade" decision.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
x27;ll be uploading 5.00-2 shortly, which will Conflict: ndiff. Can you
deal with the removal bug etc?
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 516616 + help moreinfo
forcemerge 516616 520688
--
This will need someone in the mips / mipsel porting world to provide a
patch for bind9 to fix it.
lamont
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:02:51PM +0100, Rainer Canavan wrote:
> This problem has also been reported on the mips architecture
&g
tags 524574 + unreproducible
severity 524574 normal
--
Nothing in the postfix config would cause us to chgrp
/var/spool/postfix/etc to the sasl group, nor would we chmod 710 that
directory. I rather suspect this is a bug in another package.
lamont
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:39:25AM +0200
Package: bzr
Version: 1.17~rc1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of bzr_1.17~rc1-1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20090717-1034
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5
stall or remove and breaks all future apt
invocations.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild settroubleshoot:
> Automatic build of setroubleshoot_2.1.11-1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20090525-0351
[...]
> Removing texlive-base ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/texlive-ba
tags 521271 + moreinfo unreproducible
--
What version of the various packages do you have? Installing dnsutils
in a virgin sid chroot on amd64 gives me a working nslookup, with the
correct libraries all present, and I don't see anywhere that the
dependencies for dnsutils are incorrect.
l
tag 515110 + wontfix
severity 515110 wishlist
--
It is perfectly reasonable to ask the kernel what we are, and build
accordingly. Given the valid solution of using linux32, I don't see
that this is even a bug. Leaving it open anyway, but won't be fixing
it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCR
or nearly _9_ days. I'll deal with it this week.
> There's even a patch supplied, which looks IMHO sane. Any comments from
> you regarding that matter would be most welcome.
And yes, the patch looks at least semi-sane, after glancing at it twice.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Package: xserver-xorg-video-vesa
Version: 1:2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xserver-xorg-video-vesa_1:2.0.0-1 on caballero by
> sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20090118-1919
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:37:54PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I uploaded the following changes to delayed/3.
>
> Lamont, if you do not like these changes, please upload alternate fixes,
> but do not block them.
>
Any chance you have the diff in a sane (separate commit per c
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 05:47:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BIND 9.5.1rc1 is now available (since today):
> http://oldwww.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.5.1rc1
Yeah, I have the patch for just that bug backported, will be uploading
this week sometime.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: ltsp
Version: 5.1.10-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ltsp_5.1.10-2 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20081123-0916
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4),
Package: libalog
Version: 0.1-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of libalog_0.1-3 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20081123-1629
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7),
Package: lilypond
Version: 2.10.33-2.3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of lilypond_2.10.33-2.3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20081123-1631
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends:
Package: google-perftools
Version: 0.98-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of google-perftools_0.98-1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20081123-0922
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depend
the ACL bugs through a t-p-u upload, cherrypick some patches from
> the unstable version.
> Release team, what do you want to do?
I prefer (A), though I'm not wedded to it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the right answer for this.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ations here, I'd like it,
too.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
copy of your named configuration - it appears that you
have configured BIND in a way that prevents rndc from working - I'd love
do better document the ways that people break it.
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.4, status=bounced (unable to look up
> host gmx.de: Name or service not known)
What does /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf look like, and how does
that compare to /etc/resolv.conf?
This sounds far more like a resolution issue than a postfix issue...
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Package: pam-krb5-migrate
Version: 0.0.8-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
files built with gcc need to be linked with gcc, since it's allowed to
include arch-specific libraries.
lamont
> Automatic build of pam-krb5-migrate_0.0.8-1 on pen
Package: fluxconf
Version: 0.9.9.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of fluxconf_0.9.9.1-1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080811-2114
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelp
Package: gnome-cups-manager
Version: 0.31-3+b1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gnome-cups-manager_0.31-3+b1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080811-2129
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Bu
g him that he needs to deal
with making syslog happier, or (assuming it actually works) bind
mounting /dev/log. If not chrooted, then the issue is non-existent.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
helper (>= 5), dpatch
[...]
> make[1]: arch: Command not found
A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=tbb&ver=2.0r020-1
arch is dead. use uname -m.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Package: fair
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of fair_0.5.1-1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20080601-0608
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: autotools-dev, debhe
Package: libaudio-flac-header-perl
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of libaudio-flac-header-perl_2.2-1 on penalosa by sbuild/hppa
> 98
> Build started at 20080601-1453
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by p
Package: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl4-15
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of pixmap_2.6pl4-15 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080601-1553
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: libxaw7
Package: insighttoolkit
Version: 3.6.0-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of insighttoolkit_3.6.0-3 on penalosa by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20080601-1519
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depen
Package: insight
Version: 6.7.1.dfsg.1-9
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of insight_6.7.1.dfsg.1-9 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20080528-0245
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends:
Package: cmake
Version: 2.6.0-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of cmake_2.6.0-4 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20080528-0209
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.
Package: libspe2
Version: 2.2.80-95-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of libspe2_2.2.80-95-3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080528-0026
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: d
Package: spamoracle
Version: 1.4-12
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of spamoracle_1.4-12 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080527-2359
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhe
Package: tuxguitar
Version: 0.9.99~1.0rc4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of tuxguitar_0.9.99~1.0rc4-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080528-0023
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Buil
Package: basilisk2
Version: 0.9.20070407-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of basilisk2_0.9.20070407-4 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080528-0021
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-
Package: firebird2.0
Version: 2.0.3.12981.ds1-16
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of firebird2.0_2.0.3.12981.ds1-16 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080527-1813
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Package: debian-edu-artwork
Version: 0.0.27
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of debian-edu-artwork_0.0.27 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080527-1737
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-De
Package: mpatrol
Version: 1.4.8-11
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of mpatrol_1.4.8-11 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080527-1736
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (
Package: llvm-gcc-4.2
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of llvm-gcc-4.2_2.2-1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080527-1725
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelp
Package: felix
Version: 1.1.3-3.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of felix_1.1.3-3.1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080527-2219
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper
Package: srtp
Version: 1.4.4~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of srtp_1.4.4~dfsg-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080527-2117
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: autot
Package: hdbc-sqlite3
Version: 1.1.4.0.0
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of hdbc-sqlite3_1.1.4.0.0 on penalosa by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20080527-2141
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depen
Package: kaya
Version: 0.4.0-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kaya_0.4.0-4 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080527-1937
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4
Package: twinkle
Version: 1:1.2-1+b1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of twinkle_1:1.2-1+b1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080527-1233
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: automak
her in testing with 9.3.4 or in my
production world with either 9.4.2 or 9.5.0~b2.
I rather expect that it's already fixed in 9.4.2, but can't say for sure
without some more reliable reproducer...
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
happened three times, all in the last five days. Prior to this
> bind9 had been running stable for months. No recent configuration changes
> have been made.
Could you check and see if the problem still exists with bind9.4.2
(which may require a recompile...)
thanks,
lamont
--
To
Package: guile-1.8
Version: 1.8.3+1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of guile-1.8_1.8.3+1-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080211-0633
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: l
Package: btrfs-tools
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of btrfs-tools_0.12-1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080210-1301
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelp
Package: cwdaemon
Version: 0.9.4-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of cwdaemon_0.9.4-3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20080127-2123
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: autotoo
uot;-a /var/spool/postfix/dev/log"
and then rsync -av /dev/log /var/spool/postfix/dev/log
Note that any admin can do that, postfix may not edit the config file of
another package.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or postfix to edit syslog's config file so that
it sees things when it restarts.
Once there's a way for postfix to hook up to syslogd in a
policy-conformant manner, we can fix this bug.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tbb-2.0r014'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=tbb&ver=2.0r014-2
See also http://bug
Package: rpm
Version: 4.4.2.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of rpm_4.4.2.1-1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20071025-0529
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.
Package: kismet
Version: 2007-10-R1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kismet_2007-10-R1-1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20071023-1607
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhel
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 11:18:04PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=expect&ver=5.43.0-13&arch=ia64&stamp=1189059160&file=log
The attached patch is the diff for the -13.1 NMU that fixes this bug, by
making all the implicit declarations
tags 443089 + moreinfo
--
dpkg --fsys-tarfile postfix_2.3.8-2+b1_i386.deb | tar tvf - | grep
postfix-script
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 6840 2007-03-21 05:17 ./etc/postfix/postfix-script
I'm at a loss to understand how this file _isn't_ on your system.
Any ideas?
lamont
I e
Package: r-cran-maps
Version: 2.0-36-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of r-cran-maps_2.0-36-1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20070831-0748
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: deb
Package: swh-plugins
Version: 0.4.15-0.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of swh-plugins_0.4.15-0.1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20070831-0331
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends:
Package: kawari8
Version: 8.2.4-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kawari8_8.2.4-2 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20070831-0144
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.
Package: complearn-gui
Version: 0.9.7-1+b1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of complearn-gui_0.9.7-1+b1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20070831-0426
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-
reassign 435983 mdadm
--
done
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 03:44:32PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 04, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > LABEL=foo entries can no longer be mounted;
> I love generalizations...
>
> > So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2
tags 435634 + etch
--
Forwarding to the bts.
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:18:47AM +0200, Falk Siemonsmeier wrote:
> Am Do 02.08.2007 16:28 schrieb LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Could you load the latest nfs-common and mount from sid and see if
> > that
> > res
s the lvm2 package in sid fix the issue?
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 435537 + moreinfo
--
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:25:48AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> Preparing to replace mount 2.12r-19 (using .../mount_2.13~rc2-5_amd64.deb) ...
> You have NFS mount points currently mounted, and this version of mount
> requires that nfs-common be upgraded before NFS
1 - 100 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
