With udev rules that call a script to applies the apm_on_ac or apm_on_battery
settings accordingly,
the systemd resume could be handled with a unit file like this:
[Unit]
Description=Trigger all block device udev rules on resume to re-apply
non-permanent device settings (e.g. smartctl and hdpar
Package: hdparm
Severity: serious
The apm/pm-utils suspend/resume functionalities, provided by shipping the
files 20hdparm and 95hdparm-apm scripts, do not work with systemd.
(missing systemd unit files)
To allow setting defaults I would suggest to support wildcards in hdparm.conf.
And ship with
Control: reopen 744753
Please ship a working systemd unit file as given in the last comments.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Control: reopen 725284
Udev rules are only trigged when devices appear/disapper,
but not when the kernel suspends (with the device staying
present and only entering a low power state)
A systemd unit file is required to recover all hdparm settings that
devices wrongly initialize back to factory d
Michael, somehow I misread your response, as if you wanted me to patch other
packages,
but reconsidering I think you have rather expressed you'd consider a patch from
me.
Thanks for being willing to accept an improvement. I would certainly send a
patch if I were able to. So please leave the bu
> If you believe in that solution, please feel free to provide a patch.
> Complaints without action tend to be counter-productive time wasters.
Exactly. That would surely be the answer if filing this for packages that
depend on wine.
Exept, wine-party is resposible for a package that currently
> No, please file a bug against the q4wine debian package about making
> it more compatible with debian wine, not the upstream software.
They would have to patch the application since they too can not depend
on wine-bin:32.
This seems to exchange the work for including a debconf question/messa
> > Thus, the idea of letting the packet managment script provide the
> message.
>
> Or having the front end fix their assumptions. Please consider filing
> a bug against q4wine.
Please sleep over this. This sounds funny to me.
The debian wine package maintainers want upstream software
to ada
> Which front end are you using?
It was q4wine
> message should pop up via
> xmessage, and if not it will be dumped to stdout. So if your front
> end is preventing that, the issue should be fixed there.
Unfortunately, missing files already cause errors during the frontend
configuration proces
> Are you saying that the following message was never displayed to you?
Correct, the message was never displayed.
As reported, I installed a frontend that depends on wine, and strange error
messages popped up instead, caused by all kinds of missing files.
Thus my suggestion you use a high prio
Hello,
thanks for your answer.
> It is impossible for a package to install another from its postinst;
> dpkg has a lock to prevent multiple simultaneous invocations, and
> postinst scripts are run under the dpkg lock. Perhaps the postinst
> could enable i386 multiarch,
If selecting a package fo
reopen: 707226
> If you install the wine package instead of wine-bin, you will get the
> wine64-bin package,
Yes, that is also what the bug title says and exaclty what happened by
installing a package that depends on wine.
> which will present the above helpful info to the
> user.
Unfortunately
Package: wine
Severity: grave
On a freshly installed Debian stable (wheezy) on amd64, installing a frontend
like q4wine and wine seems to succeed, but running it produces strange errors.
The reason: Actually, no wine binaries or libs were installed.
Please add some debconf script to the wine-bin
Am Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:09:05 +
schrieb ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System):
> wheezy-updates does now exist.
Thanks! Is the creation of the dir now included in the script/procedure
for post wheezy releases?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
