Hello,
it seems that there are several older bugs about this configuration:
#674935 and #674936 (duplicate submission)
#697119
These go back to *early 2012*
Can we maybe get this default configuration value adjusted? We're not
talking about a code patch, here.
Thanks.
Sigh, that last instance there should be "python-gpg." These names are
all too similar.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 6:55 PM, draeath wrote:
> let me know if you'd prefer me to use python-gnupg instead
Patch tested on stretch, seems to do the job. Can't imagine it
wouldn't work on testing, too. Unfortunately, by the time I realized
that "python-gpg" and "python-gnupg" are not the same thing, I was
done. Please do let me know if you'd prefer me to use python-gnupg
instead, and I'll be happy to. Th
lt;
mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Do 06 Jul 2017 06:41:08 CEST, draeath wrote:
>
> One month does not seem like a lot of turnaround time for this. Does this
>> package have an active maintainer? I'm willing to look into updating this
>> a
One month does not seem like a lot of turnaround time for this. Does this
package have an active maintainer? I'm willing to look into updating this
and providing a patch, but I might need some handholding on the process
side. (I'm familiar with casual site-local usage of debuild, but I do not
curre
5 matches
Mail list logo
