Bug#429123: please update/request removal of your package

2007-06-15 Thread dean gaudet
go ahead and remove it. this package does not support apache2. (i might be listed as maintainer but i didn't upload it and know nothing about being a debian package maintainer.) -dean On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Package: libapache-mod-iptos > Severity: serious > Version: 1.1

Bug#398312: INITRDSTART='none' doesn't work

2006-11-12 Thread dean gaudet
Package: mdadm Version: 2.5.5-1 Severity: grave even though i have INITRDSTART='none' in my /etc/default/mdadm and rebuilt the initrd, it still goes and does array discovery at boot time. this is marked grave because it can cause dataloss if drives with stale superblocks are put together in an

Bug#398310: don't assemble all arrays on install

2006-11-12 Thread dean gaudet
Package: mdadm Version: 2.5.5-1 Severity: grave it's dangerous to generate an mdadm.conf and start running arrays automatically at install time! i nearly got bit by this. i marked this grave because there's a potential for data loss with the current install scripts. i had 4 disks which i had

Bug#376301: [patch] support non-ipv6 kernels

2006-07-24 Thread dean gaudet
the following patch fixes two bugs related to dccproc functioning when the kernel doesn't support AF_INET6. dcc_udp_bind is cloberring errno before using it... and is testing for the wrong errno... it needs to test for EAFNOSUPPORT. i probably should have dropped the EPFNOSUPPORT tests, but i'

Bug#318826: libpam-umask encounters a Segmentation fault - preventing login

2005-07-18 Thread dean gaudet
here's my patch. sorry it's large because i think that per-user umask should be optional, so i've done most of the work to make that happen... now you have to specify "user" as an argument to pam_umask.so... as it happens it has to be the first argument, because arguments are processed left-to-

Bug#318826: libpam-umask encounters a Segmentation fault - preventing login

2005-07-18 Thread dean gaudet
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Michael Berg wrote: > The latest libpam-umask (0.02) encounters a SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) this is because of some unfortunate code that i don't even think should be in the module... it's a result of the "per-user umask" support. it segfaults for any user which does *n