I was successfully able to install the SD image for stable and unstable
(daily with u-boot from 2023-01-18.
Then I upgraded stable to testing und updated u-boot to 2023.01+dfsg1.
Arne
Moin,
begin quotation from Markus Demleitner (in
<20220921185014.db6o56sxwieo3vnm@victor>):
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 11:36:08AM +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> > Bail out! ERROR:common/util.c:67:strip_ansi_escapes: assertion failed (err
> > == NULL): Error while compili
Package: luakit
Version: 1:2.2.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Luakit aborts saying:
Bail out! ERROR:common/util.c:67:strip_ansi_escapes: assertion failed (err ==
NULL): Error while compiling regular expression
?[\u001b\u009b][[()#;?]*(?:[0-9]{1,4}(?:;[0-9]{0,4})*)?[
In order to reproduce the error I took the code from here (also
attached):
https://gist.github.com/chergert/eb6149916b10d3bf094c
and commented out the #include .
and compiled it with
gcc vdso-getcpu.c -ldl
running the resulting a.out will crash on a s390x qemu guest, but on
ppc64el guest not.
I h
bionic/groovy as guest.
Am Dienstag, dem 29.06.2021 um 10:01 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Control: reassign -1 src:qemu
>
> works for me on a native machine. You should also provide a test
> case.
>
>
> On 6/28/21 7:28 PM, Arne Plöse wrote:
> > Package: openjdk-11-jre-he
Package: openjdk-11-jre-headless
Version: 11.0.11+9-1~deb10u1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I tried tu run java in an qemu emulated s390 debian VM.
The bug accects also unstabel and te openjdk versions 15, 16 and 17, but not
version 1.8
The outcome is
Same problem here on Debian unstable.mpd: symbol lookup error: mpd: undefined
symbol: _ZN7CAdPlug7factoryERKSsP4CoplRK8CPlayersRK13CFileProvider
> > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 03:07:57PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > On 2015-05-15 15:22:28, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:05:17AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > > > On 2015-05-14 20:41:15, Arne W
6:11.3-1
> > >
> > > On 2015-05-14 20:41:15, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> > > > Package: libavcodec56
> > > > Version: 6:11.3-2
> > > > Severity: grave
> > > > Tags: security
> > > > Justification: user security hole
> >
Package: libavcodec56
Version: 6:11.3-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi, as far as I can see this has not yet been reported or fixed:
CVE-2014-7937 : Multiple off-by-one errors in libavcodec/vorbisdec.c in
FFmpeg before 2.4.2, as used in Google Chrome before 40
ms and tags in 0.00 seconds
Debug: Resource removal in 0.00 seconds
Error: can't cast Hash to text
Agent version doesn't seem to matter, I've tried both 2.7 and 3.7.
Master is on 3.7.2-3 from jessie.
--
Knut Arne Bjørndal, Tekniker Easy Connect AS - http://1890.no
E-post: knut.arne.bjorn...@easyconnect.no
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/mod_dav_svn.so: undefined symbol:
dav_svn__new_error
Arne Nordmark
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=s
B: Completed
> initialization of buffer pool
> Jul 23 10:11:45 debian mysqld: 140723 10:11:45 InnoDB: Fatal error: cannot
> allocate memory for the buffer pool
Your logs indicate you ran out of memory ;-)
# perror 12
OS error code 12: Cannot allocate memory
--
Regards();
return &
I am not at home right now, I will have to wait 10 days or so.
Greetings from Holland,
Arne
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:24 PM, Laurent Bigonville
wrote:
Hi,
Could you a little bit more precise on what's happening? The window is
not shown and that's all?
Could you maybe
Package: gnome-system-monitor
Version: 3.10.2-2
Severity: grave
# gnome-system-monitor
glibtop: Non-standard uts for running kernel:
release 3.12-1-amd64=3.12.0 gives version code 199680
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Ar
Package: dict-freedict-eng-rus
Version: 2014.02.02-1
Severity: serious
Preparing to unpack .../dict-freedict-eng-rus_2014.02.02-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking dict-freedict-eng-rus (2014.02.02-1) ...
Setting up dict-freedict-eng-rus (2014.02.02-1) ...
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/dictd no
Package: dict-freedict-nld-deu
Version: 2014.02.02-1
Severity: grave
Preparing to unpack .../dict-freedict-nld-deu_2014.02.02-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking dict-freedict-nld-deu (2014.02.02-1) ...
Setting up dict-freedict-nld-deu (2014.02.02-1) ...
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/dictd not
Package: libav-tools
Version: 6:9.11-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi...
As far as I can see, CVE-2011-3935 [1] applies to libav-tools. As the
descriptions for the problem are bit low on information I use a high
severity - feel free to lower it if that is not
Thank you for reacting quickly!
begin quotation from Theodore Ts'o (in <20140112234500.ga15...@thunk.org>):
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 09:27:14PM +0100, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> > This grave problem is now open for more than two months. Is there any plan
> > to resolve
self. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ou but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer :
tag 729615 moreinfo
thanks
On Friday 15 November 2013 00:21:42 Arne Alder wrote:
[snip]
since last full-upgrade i'm running into problems in kmail.
First it looked like just flashy folders and mails, but the log file
said something diff
und it allready solved since 4 months:
akonadi bug report:
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-bugs/2013-September/088179.html
bugfix:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdesupport/akonadi/repository/revisions/d76aeb18fbc346e89481ce9b3157b4518e8485f7
Thanks,
Arne
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
Package: yaws
Version: 1.97-1
Severity: serious
# dpkg -P --force all yaws
(Reading database ... 315953 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing yaws ...
Stopping yaws: invoke-rc.d: initscript yaws, action "stop" failed.
dpkg: error processing yaws (--purge):
subprocess installed pre-
Hi!
Is there any fix in stable for tiff3 planned?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
A
Package: libavcodec53
Version: 6:0.8.7-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Dear Maintainer,
I have here another series of CVEs for libav. Some of these are fixed, some
of these I was not able to check. Those without comment were checked by me
and seem valid - at lea
ly as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
self. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi!
Is there any plan to fix CVE-2012-3480 / #684889 in stable?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debi
Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Arne Wichmann wrote:
>
> > I have here another series of CVEs for ffmpeg/libav:
> >
> > CVE-2012-2882
>
> Libav's ogg decoder is a bit different to the one in FFmpeg. Can you
> please provide a testfile so that we can test if this is
Source: libav
Version: 0.8.4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Dear Maintainer,
I have here another series of CVEs for ffmpeg/libav:
CVE-2012-2882
CVE-2012-5359
CVE-2012-5360
CVE-2012-5361
For the last 3 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/msvr/msvr12-017
? Are they fixed?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.
Hi...
This bug is still open in stable - is there any plan for a fix?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debi
2012/9/17 Ritesh Raj Sarraf :
> Hello Arne / Ross,
>
> This debian bug, 687925, is release critical for the OpenStack suite.
> OpenStack uses iscsitarget as its storage sub-module.
>
> As is explained in this bug report, the ietd daemon does not seem to be
> releasing the
Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.8o-4squeeze13
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
openssl in squeeze (at least up to 0.9.8o-4squeeze13) is vulnerable to
CVE-2011-5095 [1]. For reference you might have a look at [2] - the problem
seems to be that fips/dh/fips_dh_key.c doe
> I don't see how that makes the package as a whole unusable, but anyway.
> I'll leave that up to Tollef.
Point taken. (I thought it might be rather off-putting to users to see graphics break in a quite drastic way.)
> ..
>>
>> Versions of packages systemd recommends:>>> pn libpam-systemd
>>
Package: systemd
Version: 44-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Installation of systemd-sysv
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective
an free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
one can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
begin quotation from Norbert Preining (in
<20120627143050.ge25...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>):
> On Mi, 27 Jun 2012, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> > Given that, the relevant files should be removed from debian, as they are
> > not DFSG-free. Am I wrong there?
>
> Yes
begin quotation from Francesco Poli (in
<20120625215725.69523c3a3df0a27f62672...@paranoici.org>):
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:36:50 +0200 Arne Wichmann wrote:
>
> > So, at least as far as I can see, there are a number of things to be done
> > in various time frames:
>
begin quotation from Norbert Preining (in
<20120619024124.gd14...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>):
> On Sa, 16 Jun 2012, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> > > Bug #483217 about licensing issues in files by Donald Arseneau was given
> > > an exception for lenny. Do you plan to do
begin quotation from Francesco Poli (in
<20120620232034.ae7eb33bd4efe458d8ed7...@paranoici.org>):
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:38:00 +0200 Arne Wichmann wrote:
> > This serious bug is now open without any action for more than a year. Is
> > that supposed to change?
>
crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
begin quotation from Adam D. Barratt (in
<1339930157.7014.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>):
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:14 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> > Just to remember... As far as I can see there are no more rdepends left.
> > Are there any more reasons not to r
self. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ou must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
27;t support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
self, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
self. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ou but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ne can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ne can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
se his work in a more useful
> way?
And for wheezy again?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debi
begin quotation from Moritz Mühlenhoff (in
<20120416154357.GA4565@pisco.westfalen.local>):
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:43:40AM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> > On 15/04/12 16:18, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> > >Found: 665012 1.4.03-1.1
> > >
> > >As far as
icted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.16-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
This seems to have slipped through the kernel-sec repository...
Citing Redhat:
The issue is that the int3 handler uses a per CPU debug stack, and calls
do_traps() with interrupts enabled but pre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/16/2012 03:56 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:17:59AM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote:
>> Upgrading from 1.99-17 to 1.99-21 on wheezy today renders the
>> system unbootable. Grub cannot detect any mdraid p
/md127p2 /var ext4
rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/md1p2 /home/arne/build ext4
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/md1p5 /mnt/mail ext4
rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/md1p6 /home/arne/images
crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
solution: those are deprecated, use fso-gta0[12]
i assume those packages will disappear in a near future.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:03:04 +0200, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
Package: fso-config-gta01
Version: 20090224-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
fso-config-gta0{1,2} are uninstallable in unstable. The
self. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
begin quotation from Nicolas François (in
<20111017211732.gj16...@nekral.nekral.homelinux.net>):
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 05:20:31PM +0200, bubu...@debian.org wrote:
> > Quoting Arne Wichmann (a...@anhrefn.saar.de):
> > > This critical bug is now pending for more tha
yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
self. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
efile.in: auth2-none.o
auth2-passwd.o auth2-pubkey.o auth2-jpake.o \
Keep up the good work,
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but your
Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:12:08 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
arne [2010-07-20 12:55 +0200]:
while upgrading today i experience exactly the same issue as the op:
You need the new postgresql-8.4 to go along with this update.
well, i did
aptitude dist-upgrade
everything necessary should have
Package: postgresql-common
Version: 109
Severity: normal
while upgrading today i experience exactly the same issue as the op:
apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgr
Hi,
Is there any progress on this issue?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann
Hi,
Is there any progress on this issue?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann
an free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi...
Is there any progress on this?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann
n Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ou must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: apt-mirror
Version: 0.4.8-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
apt-mirror worked at first start without problem.
The second time the program gives:
apt-mirror is already running, exiting at /usr/bin/apt-mirror line 187.
Even after
apt-get remove apt-mirror
apt-get install apt-mirror
the program
ou but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
diff -u libmikmod-3.1.11/debian/changelog libmikmod-3.1.11/debian/changelog
--- libmikmod-3.1.11/debian/changelog
+++ libmikmod-3.1.11/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libmikmod (3.1.11-6.2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-ma
On 04/19/2010 07:48 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Package: lwat
> Version: 0.18~beta-3
> Severity: grave
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertag: debian-edu
>
> When testing lwat in a Squeeze based Debian Edu install of
> main-server+thin-client-server (using PXE), it is impossi
After rebuilding libpulsecore5 0.9.10-3+lenny2 from source on amd64,
pulseaudio now works for me again. Maybe the build environment for the
security update was broken?
Arne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
looks like it is related to using bluetooth.
if the headset is connected, pavucontrol fails.
once it is disconnected, pavucontrol works again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: pavucontrol
Version: 0.9.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
am not quite sure what happend, but from one minute to the other
pavucontrol doesn't start anymore.
$ pavucontrol
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Gtk::IconThemeError'
Aborted
soem brows
What is the output of ls -al /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive ?
ls: cannot access /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive: No such file or directory
How much space is available in this directory?
df -h /
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs247M 164M 84M 67%
Package: locales-all
Version: 2.9-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
installing locales-all or running locle.gen always ends with
cannot map archive header: Invalid argument
(which makes the installtion fail, of course) and the loacles are not
available. since locales did
i didn't find any!
if there is one, please, give the number.
regards
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:24:49 +0200, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
forcemerge 443129 447404
kthxbye
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 22:19:24 +0200, arne anka wrote:
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.40.4
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.40.4-2
Severity: grave
File: fglrx-driver
Justification: renders package unusable
the package is uninstallable:
aptitude install fglrx-driver
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state informatio
Package: lwat
Followup-For: Bug #426630
The bug was caused by a typo in postinst, causing lwat to not set up an
admin.ini if the admin/user scheme was selected during installation. This is
now fixed in cvs, and will be included in 0.15-x if not before
// faj
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
Package: lwat
Version: 0.14-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When installed lwat from unstable/testing, I get no /etc/lwat/admin.ini
This makes it impossible to add new users, which is a core function for lwat.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers
Cajus Pollmeier skrev:
> Am Donnerstag 07 Dezember 2006 14:37 schrieb Finn-Arne Johansen:
>> Package: gosa
>> Version: 2.5.6-2
>> Severity: critical
>> Tags: security
>> Justification: root security hole
>>
>>
>> The documentation in gosa tell
Package: gosa
Version: 2.5.6-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
The documentation in gosa tells the admin to install gosa.conf under
/etc/gosa/gosa.conf, and to make it readable by the group www-data.
In this configuration file, the ldap admin password is stored
Raphael Hertzog skrev:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
>> Dieter Simader skrev:
>>> The sessionid is still there but not used anymore.
>>>
>>> If you need more info let me know.
>> OK, as said - I've tested that the new package i
now, I doubt that I can make the
time to verify anything else than that the upgrade went ok.
If Raphael understands the patch, I suggest it's uploaded to the
security mirror, and that a DSA is released.
--
Finn-Arne Johansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bzz.no/
Debian-edu develop
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
