2010/8/26 Lucas Nussbaum :
> That worked fine until Ruby 1.9.1, but apparently a change in Ruby
> 1.9.2 broke Rubygems 1.3.7. This is exhibited by two bugs:
[...]
> - rubygems doesn't work:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588125
I trace the following error:
--
$ gem1.9.1 list
/
Hi,
> Thanks for the follow-up. Quantlib (upstream) and I figured out a workaround.
> In previous versions we had gotten by without the configure step -- and hence
> no Makefile was created and present. That did not seem to upset earlier
> versions but it set up the current versions. Switching t
Hi,
> Now, however, using what is in unstable, ie
>
> Get:33 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main libruby1.8 1.8.7.173-1 [1679kB]
> Get:34 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main ruby1.8 1.8.7.173-1 [290kB]
> Get:35 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main ruby 4.2 [20.6kB]
> Get:36 http://ftp.us
Hi,
Can someone please comment on the status of a fix for this bug in
Etch?
We are working on our svn-repos.
Thank you.
--
ay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
> Such a layout only makes sense if someone want to coinstall ruby 1.9.0 and
> ruby
> 1.9.1: if we have only one dir (for 1.9), then won't be able to install two
> versions of the same lib (one for 1.9.0, one for 1.9.1). On the other hand, if
> a lib was ported to 1.9.0, it's likely to be eas
Hi,
> upstream ruby removed file version.h . But we already have lots of fixes
> based on string RUBY_VERSION_CODE, so it's easier to recreate this
> version.h for ruby1.9 package. This patch fix this bug.
>
> It also fix another bug introduced by ruby1.9 upstream changes.
Basically, we should n
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
# This is changes of ruby1.9, so Bug#441489 is of libinotify-ruby.
reassign 441489 libinotify-ruby
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Please follow up this discussion in 399706. I agree Ruby is stupid
> here, but I don't intend to work around it.
I don't think so.
It is not a bug of Ruby and it is bug of apt-listbugs.
I think that the behaviour is intended by the upstream author of SOAP4r.
The current
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Makefile:143: *** missing separator. Stop.
Does the line 143 contain "|#_!!_#|"?
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
".
- "Ruby's License" doesn't conflict with OpenSSL License.
- Programs cann't use libopenssl-ruby and other GPL'ed libraries.
But it is a problem of such programs,
it isn't a problem of ruby packages.
- policy 2.3 says "Every package must be accompanied
by a verbatim copy of its copyright and distribution license
in the file `/usr/share/doc//copyright'".
So, we will add a note of this fact in copyright
and close this bug.
--
akira yamada
think that debian/copyright has correct information.
We may add this point as a note to libopenssl-ruby1.8.README.Debian,
but I think that it is not a serious bug.
--
akira yamada
ded to the GPL.
Ruby is distributed with dual-license which is "Ruby's License" or GPL.
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt>
--
akira yamada
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/tk.rb:1102
> from ./tst.rb:2
This script works fine on my Debian-box.
> Same problem when doing 'require "tk"' from irb1.8
I could not reproduce the problem.
$ irb1.8
irb(main):001:0> require "tk"
=> true
Pleas
or
> Bignum (TypeError)
> from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `load'
> from /usr/bin/raggle:4795:in `load_config'
> from /usr/bin/raggle:5441:in `main'
> from /usr/bin/raggle:6461
I posted a workaround to ruby-core list:
http://blade.nagaokaut.
Martin Pitt wrote:
> There is a safe mode bypass in all Ruby versions:
I already prepared the new package and
sent a notice to security team.
But I cannot yet get DSA
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
(core dumped) $HTTPD -k start -DSSL
ruby1.8_1.8.3-1 is in unstable. please try it.
If you get SEGV with 1.8.3-1, please send the backtrace.
Thank you.
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by1.9 must have RC-bugs which is not a dummy report.
Thank you.
--
akira yamada
17 matches
Mail list logo